Email this article 
IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN (Study Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat No. No.487/Pdt.G/2020/PA-RAP Jo Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan No.73/Pdt.G/2020/PTA-MDN)
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Courts (Study of Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No. 487 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No. 73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. This research is Normative Empirical, which is research by looking at conditions in the field by linking the source of laws and regulations in force in the Republic of Indonesia. The benefits that will be received from the results of this study are to find out and analyzing the legal position of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts and To find out and analyze the Implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in the Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No.487 / Pdt .G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No.73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. The results of the research show that the provisions of the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2008 and / or Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in article 02 paragraph 04 states that "Judges in consideration of the decision of a case must state that the case concerned has strived for peace through Mediation by stating the name of the Mediator for the case concerned. The position of Mediation as stated in the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 is one of the steps that must be taken in carrying out the Judicial system which is based on the decision of the Medan High Court Panel of Judges declaring that to completely reject the Plaintiff's Lawsuit with the Consideration that the case has been taken through the Mediation route although not maximally and His legal consideration is that the position of the witnesses presented by the Plaintiff is a witness who did not see the Plaintiff and Defendant fighting, but only told the story of the Plaintiff.
Â
Keywords: Implementation, Procedure, Mediation
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buku
Munir Fuady, Arbitrase Nasional (Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis), (Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2000), hlm. 47.
Muhammad Saifullah, Mediasi Dalam Tinjauan Hukum Islam dan Hukum Positif di Indonesia, (Semarang: Walisongo Press, 2009), hlm. 79.
Moch. Faisal Salam, Penyelesaian Sengketa Bisnis Secara Nasional Dan Internasional, (Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2007), hlm. 221.
M. Yahya Harahap, Hukum Acara Perdata, (Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2008), hlm. 265.
Buku Tanya Jawab Perma RI No. 1 tahun 2008 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan, (kerjasama atas Mahkamah Agung RI, JICA, IICT 2008).
Syahrial Abbas, Mediasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Syari’ah, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Nasional, (Jakarta: Kencana, 2009), hlm. 6-7.
Gunawan Widjaja, Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa, (Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2001), hlm. 91.
Musahadi, Mediasi dan Resolusi Konflik di Indonesia, (Semarang: Walisongo Mediation Center, 2007), hlm. 84.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan;
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 01 Tahun 2008 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi;
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan
Putusan :
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat No. 487/Pdt.G/2020/PA.RAP;
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v8i2.1854
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
<
