LEGAL PROTECTION OF THE RIGHTS OF REFUND OF CONCURRENT CREDITORS IN THE BANKRUPTCY CASE OF PT. BANGUN INVESTA GRAHA (DEBTOR) IS CONNECTED WITH LAW NUMBER 37 OF 2004 CONCERNING BANKRUPTCY AND DELAY OF DEBT PAYMENT OBLIGATIONS. (Decision Study: Number 879 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020)

Wike Nopianti, Deny Guntara, Muhamad Abas, Adyan Lubis

Abstract


Law 37 of 2004 states that the debt to the creditor PT has been determined. Bangun Investa Graha can be billed on time, but PT. PPJB is terminated unilaterally and in bad faith by Bangun Investa Graha, which frequently ignores calls from creditors. In accordance with normative legal principles, this study employs qualitative research methods. In this approach, the author employs a normative juridical strategy. It is possible to draw the conclusion based on the findings of the research that has been discussed that Law Number 37 of 2004 Concerning Bankruptcy and Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) does not have any legal function against concurrent creditors who are not guaranteed. When a debtor has debts that are greater than his assets, the responsibilities of the debtor and his directors are not taken into account in the Panel of Judges' decision in this case. Due to the fact that the debtor's assets will not be distributed appropriately if the debtor is declared bankrupt by the court, concurrent creditors will suffer greater losses. The Panel of Judges considered the decision in Renvoi's cassation without understanding why the cassation was rejected—whether the debtor's condition was insufficient to pay creditors or the debtor did not want to pay concurrent creditors.

Keywords: Debts, Debtors, Creditors, Losses


References


Buku

Adrian Sutendi. Hukum Rumah Susun dan Apartemen, Jakarta: Ctk. Kedua, Sinar Grafika, 2012.

Edward Manik. Cara Mudah Memahami Proses Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Cv. Mandar Maju,2012.

Gatot Supramono. Perjanjian Utang Piutang, Banjarmasin: Kencana Prenadamedia Group, 2014.

Gunawan Widjaja dan Kartinik Muljadi (ed). Pedoman Menangani Perkara Kepailitan, Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada,2003.

Gunawan Widjaja. Resiko Hukum & Bisnis Perusahaan Pailit, Swadaya, 2009.

Hadi Shubhan. Hukum Kepailitan, Kencana Prenadamedia, Jakarta,2008

Moh.Kusnardi dan Harmaily Ibrahim (ed). Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia, Jakarta: Sinar Bakti,1988.

Muntoha.Negara Hukum Indonesia: Pasca Perubahan Undang-Undang Dasar 1945, Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipancara, ,2013.

Philipus M. Hadjan. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia, Surabaya: Bina Ilmu, 1987.

Rio Christiawan, Hukum Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Depok: PT RajaGrafindo Persada, 2020.

Soerjono Soekanto. Pengantar Penelitian Hukum, Jakarta: UI Press,1984.

Sutan Remy Sjahdeini. Sejarah, Asas, dan Teori Hukum Kepailitan Memahami Undang-Undang No.37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kapailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang, Jakarta: Prenadamedia,2016.

Urip Santoso, Hukum Perumahan, Jakarta: Ctk.1, Ed.1, Kencana,2014.

Peraturan Perundang-undangan

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945

Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang.

Putusan Pengadilan Niaga Jakarta Nomor: 32/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2019/PN Niaga Jkt.Pst

Putusan Nomor 879 K/Pdt.Sus-Pailit/2020.

Jurnal

Bimo Saputra Sejati, “Pelaksanaan Tugas dan Kewenangan Hakim Pengawas Dalam Mengawasi Pengurusan dan Pemberesan Harta Pailit di Pengadilan Niaga Surbaya†Kementerian Riset Tekonologi dan Pendidikan Tinggi Universitas Brawijaya (2015).

Dedy Tri Hartono, “Perlindungan Hukum Kreditur Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Kepailitanâ€, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Opinion Edisi 1 Vol 4 (2016).

Deny Guntara, Farhan Ashyadi, Izni Nur Izati, “Analisis Yuridis Keadaan Insolvensi Debitur Pailit PT. Mandala Airlines Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 Tentang Kepailitan dan Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang (Studi Putusan Nomor: 48/Pdt.Sus.Pailit/2014/Pn.Niaga.Jkt.Pst)†Vol. 1 No. 1 (2021): RECHTSCIENTIA.

Muhamad Abas, “Hak Mendahului Upah Pekerja Dalam Perkara Kepailitan (Analisis Putusan MK No. 18/PUU-VI/2008 Jo No. 67/PUU-XI/2013)â€, vol 3 no 1 November (2018).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v11i2.4004

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


This journal is also a member of and subscribes to the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics. 

 

Lisensi Creative Commons

All publications by Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi [p-ISSN: 2337-7216] [E-ISSN: 2620-6625] is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC - SA 4.0)