To achieve peaceful dispute resolution, the Supreme Court has shifted from a court approach to a legal dispute resolution approach by utilizing electronic media in the current modern era in order to carry out the administration of justice in a simple, fast and low cost manner and as an effort to increase access to justice. has issued Supreme Court Regulation (PerMA) number 3 of 2022 concerning electronic mediation in court. The purpose of writing this article is to determine the effectiveness of electronic mediation in resolving divorce cases at the Tanjungbalai Religious Court using empirical methods, namely research carried out directly or field observations. This research model comes from social science to research social problems and phenomena. This research was conducted at the Tanjungbalai Religious Court, North Sumatra Province. The conclusion of this research is that mediation of divorce cases at the Tanjungbalai Religious Court which is carried out electronically is not yet effective because it is not in accordance with the intent of the issuance of the Supreme Court Regulation concerning Mediation Procedures in court which is carried out using electronic media in accordance with PerMA number 3 of 2022. This is influenced by by several factors including internal and external factors

Keywords: Electronic Mediation; Religious courts; Divorce

Book

Achmad Romsan. Alternative Dispute Resolution Tenik Penyelesaian Sengketa Diluar Pengadilan: Negosiasi Dan Mediasi. Malang: Setara Press, 2016.

Murni Fuady. Metode Riset Hukum Pendekatan Teori Dan Konsep. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2018.

Saragih, Rayani, Maria Ferba, Editya Simanjuntak, Program Studi Hukum, Fakultas Sosial, Dan Hukum, and Universitas Quality Berastagi. “Efektivitas Mediasi Sebagai Alternative Dispute Resolution Terhadap Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Pematangsiantar The Effectiveness of Mediation as an Alternative Dispute Resolution Againts Divorce Cases at The Pematangsiantar Religious Court” 3, no. 2 (2020).

Soekanto, Soerjono. Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhi Penegakan Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali, 2013.

Regulasi

Agung, Ketua Mahkamah. “Perma No.3 Tahun 2022 Tentang Mediasi,” 2010, 3–4.

Agung, Mahkamah. PerMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016, 2016.

Journal

Hariyani, Sri. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan.” Negara Dan Keadilan 9, no. 1 (2020): 62. https://doi.org/10.33474/hukum.v9i1.7492.

Matsum, Hasan, Ramadhan Syahmedi Siregar, and Rahmat Alfi Syahri Marpaung. “Efektivifitas Mediasi Online Terhadap Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Medan Pada Era Pandemi Covid -19.” Hukum Islam Dan Pranata Sosial Islam 1, no. 2 (2022): 437–54. https://doi.org/10.30868/am.v10i02.2603.

“PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016.” Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling 53, no. 9 (2015): 1689–99. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004.

Saifullah, Muhammad. “Efektivitas Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Jawa Tengah.” Al-Ahkam 25, no. 2 (2015): 181. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2015.25.2.601.

Tjandra, Odelia Christy Putri. “Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Secara Damai Dalam Kasus Perceraian.” Sapientia Et Virtus 6, no. 2 (2021): 118–28. https://doi.org/10.37477/sev.v6i2.334.

Tobing, Gindo L. “Hukum Adat Sebagai Pranata Hukum Penyelesaian Perselisihan Melalui Musyawarah Mufakat Dalam Lingkungan Masyarakat.” Jurnal Hukum Tora 2, no. 3 (2016): 401–12.