Email this article 
WANPRESTATIONS IN MUSLIM CLOTHING SALE AND PURCHASE AGREEMENTS ARE LINKED TO AGREEMENT LAW AND TASIKMALAYA STATE COURT RULING NUMBER 28/Pdt.G/2021/PN Tsm
Abstract
The agreement is a law for the parties who make it. If the agreement is not implemented, then a breach of contract occurs. The author examines defaults in sales and purchase agreements for Muslim clothing with the aim of finding out and analyzing defaults in sales and purchase agreements in terms of contract law. Apart from that, to find out and analyze the decision of the Tasikmalaya District Court regarding default in the sale and purchase agreement for Muslim clothing. This research is descriptive in nature. This type of research is normative legal research. The approach methods used are the regulatory approach and the case approach. Data was obtained through document study and analysis using qualitative normative methods. It’s implementation there was a default by Andri Kristian as the buyer (Defendant), namely only paying the price of Muslim clothing and a loan of IDR. 1,000,000,-, while the remaining purchase and loan price is IDR. 751,760,000,- not paid. Andri Kristian committed a breach of contract in the form of fulfilling his achievements, but not as he should. The Tasikmalaya District Court's decision regarding breach of contract in the sale and purchase agreement for Muslim clothing, among other things, in the main case: granted the Plaintiff's claim in part; stated that the transaction was valid by law in the form of a receipt for the Defendant's goods from the Plaintiff amounting to a total of IDR. 447,000,000,-; stated that it was legal for the Defendant to send the loan money from the Plaintiff amounting to IDR. 305,760,000,-; stated that the receipt for the payment of the Defendant's debt to the Plaintiff was valid by law in the amount of IDR. 1,000,000,-; declare as legally valid the letter signed by the Defendant and Plaintiff on January 13 2020; stated that the Defendant had broken his promise (default) to the Plaintiff; punished the Defendant to pay the remaining debt/remaining obligation to pay the Plaintiff amounting to IDR. 751,760,000,-; reject the Plaintiff's claim for other than that; and sentenced the Defendant to pay court costs of IDR. 1,190,000,-.
Keywords: Agreement; Breach of Contract; Buy and Sell; Borrowings
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Buku
Adonara, Firman Floranta. Aspek-Aspek Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 2014.
Badrulzaman, Mariam Darus. K.U.H. Perdata Buku III Hukum Perikatan Dengan Penjelasan. Cetakan II. Bandung: Alumni, 2006.
Dawson, John P. et al. Contracts (Cases and Comment). New York: The Foundation Press, 1982.
Garner, Bryan A. (Editor in Chief). Black’s Law Dictionary. Ninth Edition. St.Paul-MN: Thomson Reuters, 2009.
Gunawan, Johannes. Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen. Bandung: Universitas Katolik Parahyangan Program Pascasarjana Program Magister Ilmu Hukum, 1999.
Harahap, M. Yahya. Segi-Segi Hukum Perjanjian. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
H.S, Salim. Hukum Perjanjian. Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika. 2006.
Isnaeni, Moch. Hipotek Pesawat Udara Di Indonesia. Surabaya: Dharma Muda, 1996.
Khairandy, Ridwan. Iktikad Baik Dalam Kebebasan B rkontrak. Cetakan 1. Jakarta: Program Pascasarjana Fakultas Hukum Universitas Indonesia, 2003.
Mertokusumo, Sudikno. Mengenal Hukum Suatu Pengantar. Edisi Kelima.Cetakan Pertama. Yogyakarta: Liberty, 2003.
Miru, Ahmadi. Hukum Perjanjian Dan Perancangan Kontrak. Cetakan Kesembilan. Depok: Rajawali Pers, 2020.
Mustafa, Bachsan. Sistem Hukum Indonesia Terpadu. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 2003.
Muhammad, Abdulkadir. Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Alumni, 1992.
Patrik, Purwahid. Dasar-Dasar Hukum Perikatan. Bandung: Mandar Maju, 1994.
Prodjodikoro, R. Wirjono. Hukum Perdata Tentang Persetujuan- Persetujuan Tertentu. Bandung: Sumur Bandung, 1995.
Widjaja, Gunawan et al. Seri Hukum Perikatan (Perikatan Yang Lahir Dari Perjanjian). Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 2003.
Satrio, J. Hukum Perjanjian: Perjanjian Pada Umumnya. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti, 1992.
Soemitro, Ronny Hanitijo. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Dan Jurimetri. Cetakan Keempat. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1990.
Subekti, R. Aneka Perjanjian. Cetakan Keenam. Bandung: Alumni, 1995.
Suhaedi, Sam. Pengantar Hukum Internasional. Bandung: Alumni, 1986.
Van Apeldoorn, L.J. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Terjemahan Oetarid Sadino. Cetakan Ketiga Puluh. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita, 2004.
Vollmar, H.F.A. Pengantar Studi Hukum Perdata. Terjemahan I. S. Adiwimarta. Jilid II. Cetakan Kedua. Jakarta: RajaGrafindo Persada, 1995.
Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Jurnal
Badan Pengembangan dan Pembinaan Bahasa Kementerian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka, 1995.
Evitasari, Ika “Kebutuhan Sekunder.” https://ruangguru.co/kebutuhan sekunder/. Diakses pada 17 Februari 2022.
Saliba, Aziz T. “Comparative Law Europe.” Contracts Law and Legislation Vol. 8 No. 3 ( September 2001).
Putusan
Putusan Nomor 28/Pdt.G/2021/PN Tsm.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v12i4.6054
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
<
