COMPENSATION FOR LAND PROCUREMENT FOR PUBLIC INTERESTS LAW AND INTERNATIONAL SAFEGUARD PERSPECTIVE
Abstract
Conflicts when acquiring land for public purposes cannot be avoided. Land acquisition for public purposes is part of development carried out by the state through land acquisition. Conflicts such as land owners not accepting compensation provided by the state include problems during land acquisition. The aim of this research is to find the causes of conflict between land owners and the government when procuring land for public purposes. The second objective is to find a form of compensation that is carried out from the perspective of law and international safeguards. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative method. Meanwhile, data collection was carried out by collecting various scientific articles, laws and international safeguard documents. After that, make comparisons and draw various conclusions. The findings are that there is conflict between the government and land owners because compensation does not match the land owner's perspective. The solution taken is through deliberation to reach a consensus so that the land owner is willing to relinquish their rights to the land. Another result is that the compensation given from a legal perspective is very fair because it takes into account various aspects including the economic value of the land. Meanwhile, SafeGuar International views it as more comprehensive because it is not just compensation based on economic value but there is empowerment for the affected communities, including gender empowerment and replacement of livelihood sources.
Keywords: Land Acquisition; Public Interest; International Safeguards; Compensation; Conflict.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Book
Fiantika, Feny Rita et al. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif.: PT. Global Eksekutif Teknologi. Sumatera Barat. 2022 https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=O-B3eJYAAAAJ&hl=en.
Mulyadi, Mohammad. “Implementasi Kebijakan Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Jakarta Utara.” Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian DPR RI. (2017)
Zuchri Abdussamad. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. CV. syakir Media Press iii. Makassar. (2022)
Regulations
Republic of Indonesia Law Number 2 of 2012 concerning Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest
Government Regulation of the Republic of Indonesia Number 39 of 2023 Concerning the Implementation of Land Acquisition for Development in the Public Interest.
Journal
Ali, Arifin. "Konflik Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Kasus Di Dinas Perumahan Permukiman Dan Pertanahan Kota Tidore Kepulauan)." Akrab Juara : Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial, Vol. 6. No. 5. (2021). Pp. 142-157 https://akrabjuara.com/index.php/akrabjuara/article/view/1694/1499.
Anisa, Kholfa, et al. “Dampak Pengadaan Tanah Jalan Tol Trans Sumatera Pada Kondisi Penghidupan Masyarakat Di Desa Serdang”. Tunas Agraria, vol. 4, no. 3, May 2022, pp. 340-51, doi:10.31292/jta.v4i3.154.
Aris Syahputra Situmorang. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Ganti Rugi Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Meysita Arum Nugroho. Vo. 6, No. 2. (2022). pp. 2983–90.
Debora, Agnes, and Wardani Rizkianti. “Tindakan Hukum Konflik Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2012 Tentang Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Kepada Masyarakat Yang Terkena Efeknya Selain Uang Kompensasi , Yaitu Opsi.” Vol. 6, No. 3. (2023) pp. 1–11.
Harahap, Roosdiana. “Kebijakan Ganti Rugi Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Dengan Berlakunya Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja.” Al-Qisth Law Review. Vol. 7, No. 1. (2023). pp. 88.
Iga Gangga Santi Dewi. “Konflik Tentang Ganti Rugi Non Fisik Pada Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Jurnal Masalah Masalah Hukum. Vol. 46, No. 3. (2017)
Iqsal Madani, Sako. “Analisis Terhadap Penetapan Nilai Ganti Untung Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Dalam Pembangunan Jalan Tol.” Online Administrative Law & Governance Journal. Vol. 4, No. 2. (2021). pp. 2621–2781.
Kotalewala, Fengky, Adonia Ivone Laturette, and Novyta Uktolseja. “Penyelesaian Sengketa Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Jalan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Sasi. Vol. 26, No. 3. (2020). pp. 415.
Lestari, Putri. “Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Demi Kepentingan Umum Di Indonesia Berdasarkan Pancasila.” SIGn Jurnal Hukum. Vol. 1, No. 2. (2020). pp. 71–86.
Muliawan, Jarot Widya. “Cara Mudah Pahami Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Pembangunan Melalui Konsep 3 in 1 in the Land Acquisition / How To Easily Understand Land Procurement for Development Using 3 in 1 in the Land Acquisition Concept.” Jurnal Hukum Peratun. Vol. 1, No. 2. (2018). pp. 163–82.
Prabandari, Luh Nyoman Diah Sri, I Wayan Arthanaya, and Luh Putu Suryani. “Pemberian Ganti Rugi Terhadap Pengadaan Tanah Oleh Pemerintah Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Jurnal Analogi Hukum. Vol. 3, No. 1. (2021). p. 1–5.
Prasetyo, Agung Basuki. 2018. “Prinsip Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Kepentingan Umum.” Administrative Law and Governance Journal. Vol. 1, No. 3. (2018). pp. 259–67.
Rachmawati, D., R. Setyasuryantoro, and F. T. Ylma. “Penyerahan Pembayaran Ganti Rugi Oleh Pemerintah Daerah Atas Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3726/K/Pdt/2016)”. UNES Law Review, Vol. 6, no. 1, Sept. 2023, pp. 2076-85, doi:10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.961.
Rusandi, and Muhammad Rusli. “Merancang Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar/Deskriptif Dan Studi Kasus.” Al-Ubudiyah: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Studi Islam. Vol. 2, No. 1. (2021). pp. 48–60.
Sagala, Samuel, Besty Habeahan, and Jinner Sidauruk. “Penetapan Nilai Ganti Rugi Kerugian Atas Tanah Dalam Hal Pengadaan Tanah Demi Kepentingan Umum (Studi Kasus Putusan No. Reg. 297/Pdt.G/2018/Pn. Cbi).” Nommensen Journal of Private Law. Vol. 1, No. 1. (2022). pp. 37–42. https://ejournal.uhn.ac.id/index.php/private_law/article/download/586/620/3977.
Sarif, Asri, Rahman Hasima, and Ayib Rosidin. “Penyelesaian Konflik Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Law Review. No. 6, Vol. 1. (2022) 58–81.
Sigarlaki, Belinda, Roosie Lasut, and Roy Lembong. “Analisis Terhadap Pengaturan Kewenangan Pemerintah Dalam Pengambilalihan Hak Atas Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Lex Privatum . Vol. XI, No. 2, Mar. (2023)
Sudana, Ervan Hari, Djoni S.Gozali, and Akhmadi Yusran. “Asas Keadilan Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Bagi Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Notary Law Journal. Vol. 1, No. 1. (2022). pp. 49–62.
Sufriadi, Yanto. “Penyebab Sengketa Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Studi Kasus Sengketa Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Bengkulu).” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum. Vol. 18, No. 1. (2011). pp. 42–62.
Suraji, Suraji et al. “Analisa Permasalahan Pengadaan Tanah Dan Dampak Sosial Pembangunan Jalan Tol Manado-Bitung.” Jurnal Media Birokrasi. (2022). pp. 85–98.
Susilaningsih, Tri. “Musyawarah Dalam Penentuan Ganti Kerugian Bagi Pelaksanaan Pembangunan Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum. Vol. 9, No. 2. (2018). pp. 214–24.
Urrahmi, Miftah et al. "Implementasi Kebijakan Sistem Zonasi Dalam Penerimaan Mahasiswa Baru ". Jurnal Mahasiwa Ilmu Administrasi Publik (JMIAP). Vol. 2, No. 2. (2020). pp. 9–17.
Utomo, Setiyo. “Problematika Proses Pengadaan Tanah.” Jurnal Justisia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Perundang-undangan dan Pranata Sosial. Vol. 5, No. 2. (2020). pp. 20.
Wahid, Abdul, Susilo Handoyo, and Johan’s Kadir Putra. “Mechanism Of Compensation In Land Awailability Artikel.” Jurnal Lex Suprema. Vol. 2, No. 1. (2020). pp. 924–41.
———. “Mekanisme Penyelesaian Pemberian Ganti Rugi Dalam Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum Di Kabupaten Paser.” Jurnal Lex Suprema Vol. 2, No. 1. (2020). pp. 236–59. https://jurnal.itbsemarang.ac.id/index.php/JIKMA/article/download/348/347.
———. “Kajian Hukum Terhadap Pelaksanaan Musyawarah Penetapan Bentuk Ganti Kerugian Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum.” Lex Administratum Vol. IX, No. 8. (2021). pp. 217–27.
Wardhani, Dwi Kusumo, and Siti Chadijah. “Ganti Rugi Terhadap Pelepasan Hak Atas Tanah Dalam Rangka Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum: Progesivitas Atau Regresivitas?” Rechtsregel : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum. Vol. 5, No. 1. (2022). pp. 55-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32493/rjih.v5i1.23775
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i1.6187
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.