RELEVANSI DOKTRIN WORK MADE FOR HIRE DALAM KARYA KECERDASAN BUATAN: TINJAUAN HUKUM HAK CIPTA INDONESIA
Abstract
The rapid development of artificial intelligence (AI) has raised various legal issues, particularly regarding the determination of copyright ownership of works produced with the assistance or intervention of AI systems. In the context of Indonesian law, there are currently no specific regulations governing the legal status of AI-based works, resulting in a legal vacuum in the copyright regime. Based on the principle of the rule of law as stipulated in the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, the state has the authority to formulate regulations to ensure legal certainty and protection in the field of intellectual property. This study aims to analyze the regulation of artificial intelligence from a copyright law perspective through a comparative approach to regulations in several countries and to examine the relevance of applying the work made for hire doctrine as a normative solution in Indonesian law. The research method used is doctrinal legal research with a legislative and comparative law approach. The results of the study show that several countries, such as the United States, the United Kingdom, and China, have developed regulatory frameworks or specific legal doctrines to address copyright issues over AI-based works. In contrast, Indonesia still does not have specific regulations that accommodate these developments. Therefore, this study recommends the need to update Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright by integrating provisions regarding artificial intelligence, one of which is through the limited adoption of the work made for hire doctrine, in order to provide legal certainty and copyright protection that is adaptive to technological developments.
Keywords: work made for hire; copyright law; artificial intelligence; legal reform; intellectual propertyFull Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Buku
Amrizal, Victor, and Qurrotul Aini. Kecerdasan Buatan. Jakarta: Halaman Moeka Publishing, 2013.
Jaya, Hendra,et.al. Kecerdasan Buatan. Makassar: Fakultas MIPA Universitas Negeri Makassar, 2018.
Soekanto, Soerjono. Pokok-Pokok Sosiologi Hukum. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers, 1980.
Peraturan Perundangan
Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Undang-Undang Nomor 28 Tahun 2014 Tentang Hak Cipta
The Copyright, Design and Patents Act (CDPA) of United Kingdom
Copyright Law Of The People Republic Of China
Copyright Law Of The United States
Jurnal
Achmadi, Irsyad Maulana, Aisha Tsabita Kamila, and Feymi Angelina. “Penegakan Perlindungan Hak Cipta Bagi Karya Buatan Artificial Intelligence Menggunakan Doktrin Work Made For Hire,” 2023, 2.
Djuliana, and Elfrida Ratnawati Gultom. “Perbandingan Sistem Hukum Antara Indonesia Dan China Terkait Perlindungan Merek Terkenal Tidak Terdaftar.” Ensiklopedia Of Journal 5 (2023): 581.
He, Tianxiang. “The Sentimental Fools And The FIctitious Authors: Rethinking The Copyright Issues of AI-Generated Contents In China.” Asia Pacific Law Review 2 (2020): 16.
Kuai, Joanne, Raul Ferrer-Conill, and Michael Karlsson. “AI ≥ Journalism: How the Chinese Copyright Law Protects Tech Giants’AI Innovations and Disrupts the Journalistic Institution.” Digital Journalism 10 (2022): 1904.
Margoni, Thomas. “Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning And EU Copyright Law : Who Own AI?” Centre For Copyright And New Business Models In The Creative Economy Journal 20 (2018): 3.
Scannel, Barry. “When Irish Are Smiling : Could Ireland’s Legislative Approach Be A Model For Resolving AI Authorship For EU Member States?” Jornal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice 17 (2022): 737.
Sugiyatmo, Agus, and Listyowati Sumanto. “Perbandingan Hukum Tentang Hukuman Pidana Mati Di Indonesia Dengan Republik Rakyat China ( Tiongkok ).” Journal Of Social Science Research 4 (2024).
Tektona, Rahmadi Indra, Nuzulia Kumala Sari, and Maulana Reyza Alfaris. “Quo Vadis Undang-Undang Hak Cipta Di Indonesia : Perbandingan Konsep Artificial Intelligence Di Beberapa Negara.” Negara Hukum 2 (2021): 286.
Website
Amazon. “New Research Shows That Digital Technology Could Add 520 Billion To UK Economy By 2030,” 2024. https://www.aboutamazon.co.uk/news/aws/uk-digital-technology-report-2024.
Ensiklopedia Dunia. “Politik Amerika Serikat,” n.d. https://p2k.stekom.ac.id/ensiklopedia/Politik_Amerika_Serikat
Government UK. “Artificial Intelligence and IP Copyright and Patens,” 2022. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/artificial-intelligence-and-ip-copyright-and-patents/artificial-intelligence-and-intellectual-property-copyright-and-patents.
Hoover Institution. “China’s Rise In Artificial Intelligence : Ingredients And Economic Implication,” 2018. https://www.hoover.org/research/chinas-rise-artificial-intelligence-ingredients-and-economic-implications.
Oktavira, Bernadetha Aurelia. “Mengenal Perbedaan Civil Law Dan Common Law.” Hukum Online, 2023. https://www.hukumonline.com/klinik/a/perbedaan-civil-law-dan-common-law-lt58f8174750e97/.
owe. “Legalities 4 : What Is Work Made For Hire?,” n.d. https://www.owe.com/resources/legalities/4-what-is-work-made-for-hire/.
Slide Share. “Perbandingan Administrasi Negara Inggris Dan Indonesia,” 2019. https://www.slideshare.net/slideshow/perbandingan-administrasi-negara-inggris-dengan-indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6601
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
<










