URGENSI PENDEKATAN RESTORATIF DALAM PENANGANAN KASUS KEKERASAN TERHADAP ANAK: ANALISIS YURIDIS TERHADAP KESENJANGAN ANTARA HUKUM FORMIL DAN PERLINDUNGAN HAK ANAK
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the implementation of diversion and restorative justice in the juvenile justice system and assess their contribution to the restoration of child victims' rights. This study is motivated by the gap between the progressive normative framework and implementation practices that do not focus on victim recovery. The method used is a normative juridical approach with a regulatory and conceptualization approach, supported by an analysis of diversion implementation practices at the judicial level. The results of the study indicate that although normatively, diversion and restorative justice have a strong legal basis, their implementation tends to be formalistic and ineffective in guaranteeing the restoration of child victims' rights. Diversion in practice focuses more on case resolution than on comprehensive victim recovery, including psychological, social, and resolution aspects. This study also found that the main obstacles lie in normative and practical aspects. Normatively, including the scope of diversion, the administrative nature of victim protection mechanisms, and the lack of integration of the victim protection system with the diversion process hinder the effectiveness of restorative justice. Practically, limitations in institutional capacity, human resources, and access to protection services also exacerbate these weaknesses. The novelty of this research lies in its assertion that the failure of restorative justice in practice is not solely due to implementation factors, but also to the design of formal criminal law, which has not yet integrated victim recovery as its primary focus. Therefore, policy reformulation is needed that places victims at the center of every diversion process to achieve substantive justice.
Keywords: diversion, restorative justice, child protection, victims, juvenile criminal justice systemFull Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Buku
Aryanto. Perlindungan Hukum Anak Luar Nikah. 2019.
Soekanto, Soerjono, dan Sri Mamudji. Penelitian Hukum Normatif: Suatu Tinjauan Singkat. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada, 2010.
Peraturan Perundangan
Undang – Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.
Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak
Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Anak
Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban
Jurnal
Anwar, Mochammad. “Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Anak Pelaku Tindak Pidana Narkotika Dalam Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Syiar Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 17, no. 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.29313/sh.v17i1.5361
Hidayati, N. “Peradilan Pidana Anak Dengan Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Dan Kepentingan Terbaik Bagi Anak.” RagamRagam Jurnal Pengembangan Humaniora 13, no. 2 (2013): 144–151.
Ketut Anjaya Wilansa Wisna. “Tantangan Sistem Pemidanaan Terhadap Anak Sebagai Pelaku Tindak Pidana Dalam Sistem Peradilan Anak Di Indonesia.” Aliansi: Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora 2, no. 6 (2025): 290–301. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i6.1394.
Pakpahan, Elvira Fitriani, Tommy Leonard, dan Syahruddin Nasution. “Juridic Analysis of Independent Company Establishment Post Government Regulation Number 8 Year 2021.” International Journal of Latin Notary 1, no. 2 (2021): 150–157.
Pandia, Yovan Raphael S., dan Widodo Ramadhana. “Legal Analysis of Financial Technology (Fintech) Based Online Loan Agreements and The Legal Consequences.” Journal Equity of Law and Governance 6, no. 2 (2022): 111–118.
Permana, Afrisyal Chandra, dan Asmak Ul Hosnah. “Perlindungan Anak Sebagai Subjek Hukum: Tinjauan Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Negara Dalam Perspektif HAM.” Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum 3, no. 6 (2025): 9936.
Pratama, Agung Putra. “Analisis Politik Hukum Terhadap Penegakan Hukum Restoratif Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana Baru.” Advokasi Jurnal Ilmiah (2025): 892–903.
Ratna, Diah, Sari Hariyanto. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana dan Pemidanaan Terhadap Pelaku Kejahatan Seksual Pada Anak di Indonesia” 3, no. 11 (2025).
Rizki, Ongko Surya, Kenny Cendana, Felix Salim. “Tinjauan Yuridis SEMA Nomor 2 Tahun 2023…” 6, no. 1 (2025): 19–30.
Sopyan, Muhammad. “Rekonstruksi Pemidanaan Anak Dalam KUHP Baru: Telaah Terhadap Konvensi Hak Anak dan Perspektif Hukum Islam.” Widya Balina 10, no. 1 (2025): 1–17.
Sulistya, Endy, Hudi Prayoga. “Pendekatan Restorative Justice Oleh Penyidik,” 2025.
Suparno, Ade Maman, Tri Setiady, Wiwin Triyunarti. “Analisis Teori Hukum Dalam Perspektif Das Sollen dan Das Sein.” Proceedings Social Sciences & Humanities (2025).
Website
KOMPASTV. “Begini Mekanisme Sidang di Pengadilan Negeri Saat Anak Terlibat Kasus Pidana - MA NEWS.” 2025. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-AyWqGXHiAc.
Mansyur, Ridwan. “Keadilan Restoratif sebagai Tujuan Pelaksanaan Diversi pada Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak.” Mahkamah Agung RI, 2017. https://www.mahkamahagung.go.id/id/artikel/2613/.
MaPPI FHUI. “Pedoman Mengadili Perkara Perempuan yang Berhadapan dengan Hukum.” Mahkamah Agung RI, 2018.
Mikhail Nilov. “Catatan KPAI: Sebanyak 2.031 Kekerasan pada Anak di 2025.” Tempo, 2025. https://www.tempo.co/
Tim Hukum Online. “Perlindungan HAM dalam Pasal 28A sampai 28J UUD 1945.” Hukumonline, 2025. https://www.hukumonline.com/
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v14i3.9160
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
<










