Analysis of Student Learning Styles Using Fleming's VARK Model in Science Subject

Sigit Subagja, Bibin Rubini

Abstract


The implementation of high-quality learning is something teachers must ensure. Consequently, teachers need to be able to design engaging learning procedures that draw students' attention to the subjects they are teaching. Understanding a student's preferred learning style is one of the necessary teachers. People with learning styles closely tied to their environments and personalities are adjusted. The process of receiving knowledge will be improved by defining the learning material to the learner's preferred learning style. One of the most used diagnostic tools for determining learning type is the VARK model. The visual, Auditory, Read/Write, and kinesthetic learning styles are divided into four divisions in the VARK paradigm. This research aims to identify the dominant learning style among science students. A qualitative descriptive methodology used one hundred junior high school students as research participants. Diagnostic exams and interviews were the tools used. Data analysis was carried out qualitatively by reducing data, presenting data, and making conclusions. According to the findings, 35% of students are kinesthetic learners, with 30% being visual, 21% being Auditory, and 14%t being Read/Write. Identifying learning tools, such as choosing learning models, creating and choosing materials, and learning media and assessment approaches that are more effective in accordance with student learning styles, can be done by developing one's understanding of learning styles.


Keywords


Learning Styles, Science, VARK

Full Text:

PDF

References


Barak, M. (2017). Science Teacher Education in the Twenty-First Century: a Pedagogical Framework for Technology-Integrated Social Constructivism. Research in Science Education, 47(2), 283–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-015-9501-y

Cornelius, F. H., & Wilson, L. (2021). Educational Technology. In Certifed Nurse Educator (CNE®) Review, Fourth Edition. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315854816-16

Felder, R. M., & Silverman, L. K. (1988). Learning and teaching styles and libraries. Journal of Engineering Education, 78(June), 674–681. https://www.engr.ncsu.edu/wp-content/uploads/drive/1QP6kBI1iQmpQbTXL-08HSl0PwJ5BYnZW/1988-LS-plus-note.pdf

Fleming, N. (2001). Teaching and Learning Styles: VARK Strategies. Neil D. Fleming. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=K04uyQEACAAJ

Ford, N., & Chen, S. Y. (2001). Matching/mismatching revisited: An empirical study of learning and teaching styles. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(1), 5–22. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8535.00173

Frankel, J. R., Wallen, N, E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How To Design And Evaluate Research In Education. In McGraw-Hill: Vol. Eight. https://doi.org/10.1086/393991

Hug, T. (2017). Defining Openness in Education. In Encyclopedia of Educational Philosophy and Theory (p. 387). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-287-588-4

Kayalar, F. (2017). The effects of Auditory LearningStrategy on Learning Skills ofLanguage Learners. IOSR Journal Of Humanities And Social Science, 22(10), 4–10. https://doi.org/10.9790/0837-2210070410

Kiang, M. (2010). Learning Styles. Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural School Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-71799-9

Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Kolb’s Learning Styles. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1698–1703). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_228

Kolb, A. Y., & Kolb, D. A. (2012). Learning Styles. In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (pp. 1974–1975). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_232

Lemley, J. B., Schumacher, G., & Vesey, W. (2014). What Learning Environments Best Address 21st-Century Students’ Perceived Needs at the Secondary Level of Instruction? NASSP Bulletin, 98(2), 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192636514528748

Magdalena, S. M. (2015). The Relationship of Learning Styles, Learning Behaviour and Learning Outcomes at the Romanian Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 180(November 2014), 1667–1672. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.05.062

Marković, S., & Jovanović, N. (2012). Learning style as a factor which affects the quality of e-learning. Artificial Intelligence Review, 38(4), 303–312. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10462-011-9253-7

Pourhosein Gilakjani, A. (2011). Visual, Auditory, Kinaesthetic Learning Styles and Their Impacts on English Language Teaching. Journal of Studies in Education, 2(1), 104. https://doi.org/10.5296/jse.v2i1.1007

Prithishkumar, I. J., & Michael, S. A. (2014). Understanding your student: using the VARK model. Journal of Postgraduate Medicine, 60(2), 183–186. https://doi.org/10.4103/0022-3859.132337

Raiyn, J. (2016). The Role of Visual Learning in Improving Students’ High-Order Thinking Skills. Journal of Education and Practice , 7(24), 115–124. www.iiste.org

Rinekso, A. B. (2021). THE REPRESENTATION OF 21st CENTURY SKILLS IN AN INDONESIAN EFL TEXTBOOK. LLT Journal: A Journal on Language and Language Teaching, 24(1), 191–211. https://doi.org/10.24071/llt.v24i1.2655

Rochford, R. A. (2003). Assessing learning styles to improve the quality of performance of community college students in developmental writing programs: A pilot study. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 27(8), 665–677. https://doi.org/10.1080/713838240

Seel, M. (2012). Myers--Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI). In N. M. Seel (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning (p. 2413). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-1428-6_5058

Valiente, C. (2008). Are students using the “wrong†style of learning?: A multicultural scrutiny for helping teachers to appreciate differences. Active Learning in Higher Education, 9(1), 73–91. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787407086746

van Laar, E., van Deursen, A. J. A. M., van Dijk, J. A. G. M., & de Haan, J. (2020). Determinants of 21st-Century Skills and 21st-Century Digital Skills for Workers: A Systematic Literature Review. SAGE Open, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019900176




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jpbn.v9i1.3752

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Sigit Subagja, Bibin Rubini

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Biologi Nukleus (JPBN) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - SA 4.0). Official contact: Rivo +6281362238917