TERMINATION OF PROSECUTION BASED ON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN ASSAULT CASES: A CASE STUDY AT THE PALEMBANG DISTRICT ATTORNEY’S OFFICE
Abstract
The prosecution authority, as part of the state’s law enforcement system, plays a strategic role in ensuring legal certainty, justice, and public order while upholding moral values and human dignity. In this context, the application of restorative justice has emerged as an alternative approach to resolving criminal cases, including assault offenses. This study examines the implementation of termination of prosecution based on restorative justice in an assault case handled by the Palembang District Attorney’s Office. The research adopts a normative juridical method, focusing on statutory regulations and prosecutorial guidelines governing restorative justice. The findings indicate that the termination of prosecution was influenced by several key factors: the suspect committed the offense for the first time, the offense carried a maximum statutory penalty of no more than five years’ imprisonment, and the value of losses or evidence did not exceed IDR 2,500,000. Additionally, the case demonstrated successful reconciliation between the perpetrator and the victim, supported by community approval. The study concludes that the application of restorative justice in this case reflects prosecutorial discretion aimed at achieving substantive justice, social harmony, and efficiency in criminal law enforcement.
Keywords: termination of prosecution; restorative justice; assault cases; prosecutorial discretionFull Text:
PDFReferences
Books
Kurniawan, Agus. Legal Politics of the Establishment of Corruption Crime Investigation Institutions in the Criminal Justice System in Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Universitas Islam Indonesia, 2015.
Simarmata, Binsar. Waiting for the Implementation of More Humanistic Detention and Prison Sentences in Indonesia. Jakarta: Constitutional Press, 2016.
Sukadi, Imam. The Powerless of Law in the Process of Law Enforcement in Indonesia. Samarinda: Faculty of Law Mulawarman University Press, 2011.
Regulations
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 tentang Peraturan Hukum Pidana (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1981 Nomor 76, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 3209).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 16 Tahun 2004 tentang Kejaksaan Republik Indonesia (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2004 Nomor 67, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 4401).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2012 tentang Sistem Peradilan Pidana Anak (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2012 Nomor 153, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5332).
Indonesia. Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157, Tambahan Lembaran Negara Nomor 5076).
Indonesia. Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif (Berita Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2020 Nomor 811).
Indonesia. Peraturan Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2021 tentang Perubahan atas Peraturan Jaksa Agung Nomor 15 Tahun 2020 tentang Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.
Indonesia. Surat Edaran Jaksa Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor SE-2/E/Ejp/02/2022 tentang Pelaksanaan Penghentian Penuntutan Berdasarkan Keadilan Restoratif.
Journal
Citriadin, Yudi. “Qualitative Research Methods.” Sanabil 5, no. 1 (2020).
Darmataufik, Andi, Fitri Wahyuni, Hendra Gunawan, IN Syekh, Ahmad Hasan, and AA Padangsidimpuan. “Historical Analysis and Development of Utilitarianism Theory on Indonesian Law.” Journal of Economic Law 10, no. 1 (2024): 88–102.
Hamamudin, Dewi Iryani, and Puguh Aji Hari Setiawan. “Restorative Justice in Criminal Acts of Abuse Based on Statutory Regulations to Realize Legal Certainty.” Mutiara Journal of Law 2, no. 12 (2024): 1–9.
Insani, Nur Mutiara. “Restorative Justice Paradigm in Criminal Law Enforcement: A Case Study of Theft in West Nusa Tenggara.” Journal of Law and Society 4, no. 6 (2024): 2403–2411.
Isba, Putra, M. S. Sakmaf, and Jumiran. “Evaluation of Restorative Justice Implementation in Criminal Conflict Resolution: Victim and Offender Perspectives.” Delictum: Journal of Criminal Law and Islamic Criminal Law 4, no. 2 (2024).
Khalil, Muhammad, Iskandar Ali, Maulina Maulina, Ahmad M. Nurrahman, Taufik Ahmad, and Lilis Angrayni. “Effectiveness and Challenges of Restorative Justice Implementation in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System.” Journal of Law 4, no. 1 (2024): 1–21.
Koto, Zainal. “Implementation of Restorative Justice in Handling Criminal Acts to Realize Just Law Enforcement.” Journal of Police Science 17, no. 1 (2023): 1–17. https://doi.org/10.35879/jik.v17i1.389
Kusuma, W. A., K. Hayatuddin, and A. L. Mahfuz. “Legal Protection for Child Criminals Tried After Reaching Adulthood under the Juvenile Criminal Justice System Law.” Jurnal Tana Mana 3, no. 2 (2023): 85–98. https://doi.org/10.33648/jtm.v3i2.241
Lermatan, Petrus. “John Stuart Mill’s Utilitarianism and Its Relevance for Economic Activity: A Philosophy of Economics Perspective.” Utility 3, no. 1 (2024): 259–277.
Marenra, Andi, A. L. Mahfuz, M. Y. Selma, and E. Salia. “Law Enforcement by Police Investigators Against Predictive Murder.” Rectum Journal: Legal Review of Criminal Handling 5, no. 1 (2023): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i1.3036
Moho, Hasaziduhu. “Law Enforcement in Indonesia According to the Aspects of Legal Certainty, Justice, and Benefit.” Warta Journal 13, no. 1 (2019): 138–149.
Murdiyambroto, D. T., and Deni Fahmanadie. “Aspects of Legal Certainty in Restorative Justice at the General Criminal Investigation Stage.” Banua Law Review 3, no. 2 (2021): 98–115.
Napitupulu, Erasmus A. T., et al. “Opportunities and Challenges of Implementing Restorative Justice in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System.” Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum 10, no. 2 (2022).
Pratiwi, Endah, Tri Negoro, and Haykal Haykal. “Jeremy Bentham’s Utilitarianism Theory: Purpose of Law or Method of Testing Legal Products?” Constitutional Journal 19, no. 2 (2022): 268–285.
Ramli, Ismail, W. A. Hidaya, and Muharuddin Muharuddin. “Termination of Criminal Cases Based on Restorative Justice in Theft Cases in Sorong City.” Journal of Law Justice 1, no. 2 (2023): 89–108. https://doi.org/10.33506/jlj.v1i2.2868
Roychan, Wawan, Susanto, and Taufikur Rohman. “Reformulation of Restorative Justice Arrangements in Indonesia’s Criminal Justice System.” Decree: Journal of Master of Law 13, no. 2 (2023): 45–67. https://doi.org/10.55499/dekrit.v13n2.210
Sihombing, L. A. “Restorative Justice, Crime, Punishment, and Criminal Justice: A Historical Analysis.” Unes Law Review 6, no. 3 (2024): 8902–8909. https://doi.org/10.31933/unesrev.v6i3.1777
Syahrin, M. A. “Application of Restorative Justice Principles in the Integrated Criminal Justice System.” National Law Journal 48, no. 1 (2018): 97–114.
Widiartana, Gede. “Restorative Justice Paradigm in Crime Prevention Using Criminal Law.” Justitia et Pax 33, no. 1 (2017): 1–23
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6860
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
<










