HOW TO CREATE SPEAKING POLITENESS IN ELEMENTARY SCHOOL OF SDN 101788 MARINDAL 1 MEDAN

Dharyana Suryadijaya, Rahma Yunita Ansi, Dian Anggraini Harahap, Datulina Ginting, Derliana Hasibuan

Abstract


This research aims to describe and analyze the form of politeness language in conversation classroom. Interaction between the students and the teachers. The approach which is used qualitative descriptive. Thi at s research activity uses data collection methods, namely competent free involvement methods, and notes. Data of this research is the language expressions in the form of words and sentences of the speakers. The data source of this research is used oral data source in the form of speech event between the speakers, namely between the students to their teachers. The politeness language for an interaction with the teachers in classroom learning is very dominant in the three modes of speech, they are 1) request; 2) application; and 3) expect. Asking is a directive politeness act that has the goal of expecting the speech partner to be given something as requested by the speaker.


Key Words : Politeness, Politeness Language, Students, Teachers.

 

Abstrak

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menjelaskan dan mengkaji kesopanan berbicara dalam bahasa Inggris, khususnya interaksi antara siswa dan guru di kelas bahasa Inggris. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah deskriptif kualitatif. Pendekatan dan catatan keterlibatan kompeten independen digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data untuk penelitian ini. Ungkapan bahasa berupa kata-kata dan kalimat penutur merupakan data penelitian. Sumber data lisan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah tindakan berbicara antara penutur, khususnya siswa dan guru. Etiket bahasa mendominasi interaksi dengan dosen dalam tiga bidang: 1) permintaan, 2) implementasi, dan 3) harapan. meminta adalah kesantunan pribadi yang mengharapkan lawan bicara menyampaikan sesuatu sesuai permintaan penutur.

Kata kunci: kesantunan, kesantunan berbahasa, siswa, guru.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Winda et al. (2022), p. 65-72, How to Create Speaking Politeness in Elementary School.

Nadiah et al. (2019). The Students’ Self-Confidence in Public Speaking, Vol. 1, June 2019, pp. 1-11. Elite Journal, Universitas Islam Negeri Walisongo Semarang, Available online at https://www.elitejournal.org/index.php/ELITE

Herujiyanto (2015), Faktor dan Strategi Pengembangan Budaya Baca Melalui Pemahaman Mahasiswa. 33(2), 215-4846. http://en.unesco.org/

Leech (2014). Politeness's pragmatics. Oxford University Press, New York.

Sutopo. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. UNS.

Trosborg (1994). Requests, Complaints, and Apologies: Interlanguage Pragmatics.De Gruyter, Walter.

Yule, G. (1996). The Study of Language. University Press.

Birner, B. J. (2013). Introduction to pragmatics. United Kingdom: Wiley- Blackwell.

Blome and M. Tillmann (2013). Conversational implication (and how to recognize it).170-185 in Philosophy Compass, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/phc3.12003

Camp, E. Sarcasm, pretence, and the semantics pragmatics distinction.Aptara

Retrieved from https://www.sas.upenn.edu/~campe/Papers/

Camp.SarcProofs.pdf?origin=publication_detail

Cresswell (2014). 4th edition of Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Method Approaches. Sage Publications, United States of America.

Dardjowidjojo, S. (2014). Psikolinguistik. Jakarta: Yayasan Pustaka Obor Indonesia.

Denzin (1978). The research act: A theoretical perspective on sociological methodologies.Mc Graw-Hill Book Company in the United States of America.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2005). The Handbook of qualitative research. (3rd). California: Publications.

Fawziyyah and B.W.J. Santoso (2017). Implikatur percakapan pada kosmetik iklan di televisi: Pragmatik. 5(2) Seloka. Retrieved from.

https://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/seloka/article/view/20262

Grice (1975). Dalam Cole and Mogan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: speech acts, pp. 41-58. Academic Press, New York.

Griffiths (2006). An overview of English semantics and pragmatics.Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh.

Hadiati, C. (2014). Redefining cablaka banyumasan way of speaking: is it explicate?

Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 4(10), 2082- 2089. Retrieved from

http://www.academypublication.com/issues/ past/tpls/vol04/10/14.pdf

Halliday and R. Hasan (1994). Bahasa, concepts, and writing. (Asruddin Barori Tou Terjemahan). Gajah Mada University Press, Yogyakarta. (The first edition was published in 1992 by Oxford University Press.)

Haugh, M. (2015). Impoliteness implicatures. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Horn, L.R. (2006). Implicature. Dalam Horn, L.R. & Ward, G. (Eds.,) The Handbook of

Pragmatics. USA: Blackwell Publishing.

Horn (2012). Inferring and implying. K. Dalam Allan and K.M. Jaszczolt (Eds. ), The Cambridge Handbook of Pragmatics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Hymes (1974). An ethnographic method is the cornerstone of sociolinguistics.University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

Inayati, E. Citralesmana, and S. Mahdi (2014). Maxims in specificized Conversational implicatures 6(3) of the International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World. Retrieved from http://www.ijllalw. org/ finalversion635.pdf

Jafari (2013). The pragmatic understanding of Wilde's comedy: the significance of sincerity. Language Studies Theory and Practice, 3 (12), 2151-2156. doi:10.4304/tpls.3.12.2151-2156

Jaufillaili, Sujatna, E.T.S, Indira, D., & Indrayani L.M. (2017). Vague language is implied through disparagement functions in comic strips. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 3(4), 66-67. http://doi.org/10.17576/3L-2017-2304-06

Kadar, D.Z & Haugh, M. (2013). Understanding politeness.

United States of America: Cambridge University Pres.

Khan, Q., and F. A. Bughio (2012). A pragmatic study of Hamlet and Ophelia's encounter in the Nunnery. 3L: The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 18(2), pp. 25-34. Retrieved from http://ejournals.ukm.my/3l/article/view/932

Kapogianni, E. (2018) Ironic implicature strength and the test of explicit cancellability. Intercultural Pragmatics 15(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/ip-2017-0028

Kridalaksana, H. (2011). Kamus linguistic. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.

Kroeger, P R. (2018). Analyzing meaning: An introduction to semantics and pragmatics Berlin: Language Science Press.

Leech, G. (1983). Principles of pragmatics. New York: Longman. Levinson, S.C. (1983). Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v10i1.4057

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Dharyana Suryadijaya, Rahma Yunita Ansi, Dian Anggraini Harahap, Datulina Ginting, Derliana Hasibuan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Eduscience (JES) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC - SA 4.0)