ANALYSIS OF THE WEAKNESSES OF HYBRID LEARNING DURING THE PANDEMIC: CASE STUDY IN BASIC NATURAL SCIENCE (BNS) LECTURES

Muhammad Syazali, MUHAMMAD ERFAN, NOVA FITRIANI WAHDAH

Abstract


Data on deficiencies regarding preparation, planning, processes and assessment is the information needed to make improvement efforts in the future. Therefore, this research was conducted to analyze the weaknesses of hybrid learning implemented in Basic Natural science (BNS) courses. This qualitative descriptive research was carried out at the Primary Teacher Education (PTE) Study Program during the preparation, planning, learning and assessment of learning outcomes. Qualitative data was collected using observation and documentation methods. The collected data was analyzed using qualitative analysis from Miles and Huberman. The weaknesses of hybrid learning that we found include coordination carried out with senior lecturers whose expertise is non-science education, late submission of SIMAKSI to BKSDA, CPMK is limited to Science Process Skills (SPS), objectives only cover basic SPS, there are no guidelines for preparing reports, science topics are limited to ecosystems, multi tasking, the learning time interval is only two weeks, the SPS instrument only uses tests, and the tests are carried out online. It is hoped that these results can be used as evaluation material in order to improve the implementation of hybrid learning in science courses, especially BNS.

Keywords: Basic natural sciences, weaknesses, hybrid learning.

Abstrak

Data kekurangan tentang persiapan, perencanaan, proses dan assessment merupakan informasi yang dibutuhkan untuk melakukan upaya perbaikan dimasa yang akan datang. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini dilakukan untuk menganalisis kelemahan pembelajaran hybrid yang diimplementasikan pada mata kuliah IKD. Penelitian deskriptif kualitatif ini dilaksanakan pada Prodi PGSD selama proses persiapan, perencanaan, pembelajaran sampai dengan penilaian hasil belajar. Data kualitatif dikumpulkan menggunakan metode observasi dan dokumentasi. Data yang terkumpul dianalisis menggunakan analsisi kualitatif dari Miles and Huberman. Kelemahan pembelajaran hybrid yang kami temukan di antaranya koordinasi dilakukan dengan dosen senior yang keilmuannya non-pendidikan sains, telatnya pengajuan SIMAKSI ke BKSDA, CPMK terbatas pada KPS, tujuan hanya mencakup KPS dasar, tidak ada pedoman penyusunan laporan, topik sains dibatasi pada ekosistem, multi tasking, interval waktu pembelajaran hanya dua minggu, instrumen KPS hanya menggunakan tes, dan pelaksanaan tes dilaksanakan secara daring. Hasil ini diharapkan dapat menjadi bahan evaluasi dalam rangka memperbaiki implementasi hybrid learning pada mata kuliah sains khususnya IKD.

Kata Kunci: ilmu kealamiahan dasar, kelemahan, pembelajaran hybrid

 


Full Text:

PDF

References


Alsalhi, N. R., Eltahir, M. E., & Al-Qatawneh, S. S. (2019). The effect of blended learning on the achievement of ninth grade students in science and their attitudes towards its use. Heliyon, 5(9), e02424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e02424

Artayasa, I. P., Susilo, H., Lestari, U., & Indriwati, S. E. (2017). Profil keterampilan proses sains dan hubungannya dengan hasil belajar sains mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar.

Asipi, L. S., Rosalina, U., & Nopiyadi, D. (2022). The Analysis of Reading Habits Using Miles and Huberman Interactive Model to Empower Students’ Literacy at IPB Cirebon. International Journal of Education and Humanities, 2(3), 117–125. https://doi.org/10.58557/ijeh.v2i3.98

Botes, W., & Barnett, E. (2022). The analysis of natural science lesson-plans integrating the principles of transformative pedagogy. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(10), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.21.10.13

Can, B., Yildiz-Demirtas, V., & Altun, E. (2017). The effect of project- based science education programme on scientific process skills and conceptions of Kindergarten students. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(3), 395–413.

Council, N. R. (2010). Preparing Teachers: Building Evidence for Sound Policy. Washington DC: National Academies Press. https://nap.nationalacademies.org/read/12882/chapter/9

Curran, G. M. (2020). Implementation science made too simple: a teaching tool. Implementation Science Communications, 1(1), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00001-z

Department, N. Y. S. E. (2023). Science Standards Implementation Resources. https://www.nysed.gov/curriculum-instruction/science-standards-implementation-resources

Dolan, E. L., Lally, D. J., Brooks, E., & Tax, F. E. (2008). Prepping Students for Authentic Science. Science Teacher (Normal, Ill.), 75(7), 38–43. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21814296%0Ahttp://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=PMC3147287

Fauzi, W. N. A., & Setiawati, Y. (2021). Hybrid learning: model pembelajaran tatap muka terbatas di SDIT Luqman Al Hakim Sleman. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 4(2), 175–185.

Gonzáles-Gutierrez, V., Alvarez-Risco, A., Estrada-Merino, A., Anderson-Seminario, M. de las M., Mlodzianowska, S., Del-Aguila-Arcentales, S., & Yáñez, J. A. (2022). Multitasking behavior and perceptions of academic performance in University Business students in Mexico during the Covid-19 pandemic. International Journal of Mental Health Promotion, 24(4), 565–581. https://doi.org/10.32604/ijmhp.2022.021176

Harahap, F., Nasution, N. E. A., & Manurung, B. (2019). The Effect of blended kearning on student’s learning achievement and science process skills in Plant Tissue Culture Course. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 521–538.

Hendri, S., & Setiawan, W. (2016). Development of physics student work sheet (SWS) to build science process skill valued conservation. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 11(2), 126–133. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi

Hidayati, L., Amalyaningsih, R., Ningrum, A. W., Nurhayati, U., & Wakhidah, N. (2022). Respons peserta didik terhadap penerapan model pembelajaran hybrid learning di MTs Negeri 2 sidorarjo. PENSA E-Journal: Pendidikan Sains, 10(1), 155–160.

Ituma, M. G., & Twoli, N. W. (2011). Purpose and structure of tests in secondary school chemistry: the teachers’ response. Proceedings of the ICE, 813–828.

Ka’bai, Nur, B. A., & Nur, S. A. A. (2022). Students’ motivation in learning english through hybrid learning during Covid-19 pandemic at vocational high school. IDEAS: Journal on English Language Teaching and Learning, Linguistics and Literature, 10(1), 424–435. https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v10i1.2691

Kenney, J., & Newcombe, E. (2011). Adopting a blended learning approach: challenges encountered and lessons learned in an action research study. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 15(1), 45–57.

Lahiri, S., Abdin, R., Elimelech, A., Salgueiro Massimilian, S., & Averkiou, P. (2022). The importance of incorporating service-learning projects into the medical school curriculum. International Journal of Medical Students, 10(4), 425–428. https://doi.org/10.5195/ijms.2022.1497

Lestari, Syafril, S., Latifah, S., Engkizar, E., Damri, D., Asril, Z., & Yaumas, N. E. (2021). Hybrid learning on problem-solving abiities in physics learning: A literature review. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1796, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1796/1/012021

Li, C., He, J., Yuan, C., Chen, B., & Sun, Z. (2019). The effects of blended learning on knowledge, skills, and satisfaction in nursing students: A meta-analysis. Nurse Education Today, 82(February), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2019.08.004

Limniou, M., Duret, D., & Hands, C. (2020). Comparisons between three disciplines regarding device usage in a lecture theatre, academic performance and learning. Higher Education Pedagogies, 5(1), 132–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/23752696.2020.1797522

Mahyuny, S. R., Nursamsu, N., Hasruddin, H., & Muslim, M. (2022). Development of Students Worksheet Learning Tools Made by Ethnoscience Based on Science Literacy. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 8(4), 2294–2301. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v8i4.1949

Mat, H. binti. (2019). Development and effect of integrated science process skills module towards higher order thinking skills based on edutainment. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 9(2), 919–931. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v9-i2/5638

McLean, S., Attardi, S. M., Faden, L., & Goldszmidt, M. (2016). Flipped classrooms and student learning: Not just surface gains. Advances in Physiology Education, 40(1), 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00098.2015

Morgan, H. (2022). Conducting a qualitative document analysis. Qualitative Report, 27(1), 64–77. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2022.5044

Mucshini, B., & Siswandari, S. (2020). Hybrid learning design to minimize academic stress of digital natives generation in accounting course. Journal of Educational Science and Technology (EST), 6(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.26858/est.v6i1.11045

Nagy, R., & Warta, D. V. (2021). Online Assessment of English for Specific Purposes. Computer Science & Information Technology (CS & IT), 317–325. https://doi.org/10.5121/csit.2021.111426

Nancy, A., Raj, J. B., Anton, J. D., Aravinthan, S., & Adkoli, B. V. (2022). Online assessment vs Traditional assessment: perception of medical teachers in a tertiary level teaching hospital in South India. European Journal of Anatomy, 26(5), 599–603. https://doi.org/10.52083/CPSZ4396

NSTA. (2017). Science Teacher Preparation. National Science Teaching Association. https://www.nsta.org/nstas-official-positions/science-teacher-preparation

Nuha, U., Scisnayani, Y., Supeno, Wahyuni, D., & Rusdianto. (2023). Development of Collaborative-Based Worksheets to Improve Science Process Skills in Science Learning. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 9(7), 5390–5397. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v9i7.2927

Olson, J. K. (2017). Teacher Preparation for Science Education. In Science Education (pp. 523–537). Brill. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6300-749-8_38

Prayitno, B. A., Corebima, D., Susilo, H., Zubaidah, S., & Ramli, M. (2015). Closing the science process skills GAP between students with high and low level academic achievement. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 16(2), 266–277.

Rahmadi, T. N. (2021). Penerapan model digital dan model hybrid Dalam Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh (PJJ) selama pandemi Covid-19. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi), 2(10), 1800–1811.

Rahmatih, A. N., & Fauzi, A. (2020). Persepsi mahasiswa calon guru sekolah dasar dalam menanggapi perkuliahan secara daring selama masa Covid-19. MODELING: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 7(2), 143–153.

Scott, P. (2005). Planning science instruction : from insights to learning to pedagogical practices. VII Congreso Internacional de Investigación En La Enseñanza de Las Ciencias, 1–26. http://scholar.google.com/scholar?hl=en&btnG=Search&q=intitle:Planning+science+instruction+:+from+insights+to+learning+to+pedagogical+practices#0

Singh, J., Steele, K., & Singh, L. (2021). Combining the best of online and face-to-face learning: hybrid and blended learning approach for Covid-19, post vaccine, & post-pandemic world. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 50(2), 140–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/00472395211047865

Soicher, R. N., Becker-Blease, K. A., & Bostwick, K. C. P. (2020). Adapting implementation science for higher education research: the systematic study of implementing evidence-based practices in college classrooms. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00255-0

Stroupe, D., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, S. P. (2020). Preparing Science Teachers Through Practice-Based Teacher Education. Harvard: Harvard Education Press.

Stupnitskaya, M. A., Alekseeva, S. I., & Nalobina, A. N. (2022). A toolkit to assess the level of universal competencies (soft skills) of Pedagogical University Students. Education and Self Development, 17(1), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.17.1.17

Supena, I., Darmuki, A., & Hariyadi, A. (2021). The Influence of 4C (Constructive, Critical, Creativity, Collaborative) learning model on students’ learning outcomes. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 873–892.

Syazali, M., Erfan, M., Hasnawati, H., & Zain Amrullah, L. W. (2022). Monitoring penggunaan tools dalam mengimplementasikan pembelajaran daring: Apakah biayanya mahal bagi mahasiswa? Jurnal Ilmiah Profesi Pendidikan, 7(4), 2393–2400. https://doi.org/10.29303/jipp.v7i4.906

Syazali, M., & Ilhamdi, M. L. (2022). Implementation of online learning and its impact on student science competency. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 17(2), 192–198. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i2.3097

Syazali, M., Rahmatih, A. N., & Nursaptini, N. (2021). Profil keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa melalui implementasi SPADA Unram. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 16(1), 103–112. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v16i1.2290

Syazali, M., & Umar, U. (2022). Catatan Pembelajaran Jarak Jauh: Hasil Belajar Sains Dan Pembelajarannya Pada Mahasiswa Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Eduscience, 9(1), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v9i1.2520

Syazali, M., Widiada, I. K., & Zain, M. I. (2022). Keterampilan proses sains mahasiswa non-sains melalui pemanfaatan spada unram dan laboratorium alam. COLLASE: Journal of Elementary Education, 05(03), 579–586.

Tegeh, I. M., Astawan, I. G., Sudiana, I. K., & Kristiantari, M. G. R. (2021). Murder Learning Model Assisted By Metacognitive Scaffolding To Improve Students’ Scientific Literacy and Numeracy Skills Through Science Studies in Elementary Schools. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 10(4), 618–626. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v10i4.32926

Widodo, A., Nursaptini, N., Novitasari, S., Sutisna, D., & Umar, U. (2020). From face-to-face learning to web base learning: How are student readiness? Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Dan Pembelajaran, 10(2), 149–160. https://doi.org/10.25273/pe.v10i2.6801

Wishart, D. J., & D’Elia, L. A. (2013). Engaging disenfranchised urban youth in humanities learning. Journal of Contemporary Issues in Education, 7(2), 15–29. https://doi.org/10.20355/c52p4b

Zaika, O. V., Vakaliuk, T. A., Riabko, A. V., Kukharchuk, R. P., Mintii, I. S., & Semerikov, S. O. (2021). Selection of online tools for creating math tests. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2898, 82–106.

Zmiivskiy, H., Petruk, O., & Puhach, V. (2021). Some aspects of using infographics to improve the effectiveness of online testing in tactical disciplines. New Collegium, 1(103), 90–94. https://doi.org/10.30837/nc.2021.1.90




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v10i3.5049

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Muhammad Syazali

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Eduscience (JES) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC - SA 4.0)