DISCLOSURE OF FORMATIVE ASSESSMENT PRACTICES IN THE MERDEKA CURRICULUM

Muh Fitrah, Muhammad Wajdi, Asrinan Asrinan, Rukiana Novianti Putri, Caly Setiawan, Anastasia Safroniou, Ruslan Ruslan

Abstract


Purpose – This research aims to analyze the experiences of middle school teachers in implementing formative assessment within the Merdeka Curriculum framework.

Methodology—A qualitative case study was conducted from August to October at a Middle School in Bima City, West Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia. Ten Teacher Facilitators implementing the Merdeka Curriculum served as respondents. Data were collected through in-depth interviews, direct observations, and document analysis, then validated through triangulation and cross-checking. The data analysis included collection, condensation, display, and conclusion drawing.

Findings – The findings indicate that teachers effectively utilized various formative assessment methods, including direct observation, quizzes, questionnaires, written tests, Q&A sessions, assignments, performance assessments, portfolios, and feedback. Feedback strategies addressed students' feelings, material reflections, and test evaluations. Students responded positively, showing acceptance, satisfaction, and increased motivation. The continuity of formative assessment improved learning activities and participation. Teachers employed engaging strategies such as feedback, self-evaluation, and peer assessment, while assessment data were utilized for result analysis, lesson planning, and differentiated learning. Despite challenges in question design, format analysis, and assessment selection, teachers recommended regular formative assessment implementation, enhanced student engagement, constructive feedback, professional competence improvement, responsiveness to student needs, and parental involvement.

Significance – This study provides insights into the practical application of formative assessment in the Merdeka Curriculum, offering strategies to enhance teaching effectiveness and student engagement while addressing challenges faced by educators in resource-limited contexts.

 

Keywords: Formative assessment, Merdeka curriculum, Teaching practices, Education.


Full Text:

PDF

References


Adusei-Asante, K. (2017). Towards developing policy impact assessment framework: An introduction. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Conference of the International Association for Impact Assessment.

Ahmad, I., Saeed, M., & Salam, M. (2013). Effects of corrective feedback on academic achievements of students: Case of government secondary schools in Pakistan. International Journal of Science and Research, 2(1), 36–40.

Andersson, C., & Palm, T. (2017). The impact of formative assessment on student achievement: A study of the effects of changes to classroom practice after a comprehensive professional development programme. Learning and Instruction, 49, 92–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.006

Anggara, A., Amini, A., Faridah, F., Siregar, M., Faraiddin, M., & Syafrida, N. (2023). Penerapan Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar pada Satuan Pendidikan Jenjang SMP. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 1899–1904.

Araceli Ruiz-Primo, M., & Furtak, E. M. (2006). Informal Formative Assessment and Scientific Inquiry: Exploring Teachers’ Practices and Student Learning. Educational Assessment, 11(3), 237–263. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326977ea1103&4_4

Ardiansyah, A., Sagita, F., & Juanda, J. (2023). Assesmen dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Jurnal Literasi Dan Pembelajaran Indonesia, 3(1), 8–13.

Aslam, R., Khan, N., & Ahmed, U. (2023). Constructive Feedback Intervention for Students’ Academic Achievement in Chemistry: A Case of Public Secondary Schools of Pakistan. UMT Education Review, 6(1), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.32350/10.32350/uer.61.05

Astuti, M., Ismail, F., Fatimah, S., Puspita, W., & Herlina, H. (2024). The relevance of the Merdeka Curriculum in improving the quality of Islamic education in Indonesia. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(6), 56–72. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.6.3

Beesley, A. D., Clark, T. F., Dempsey, K., & Tweed, A. (2018). Enhancing Formative Assessment Practice and Encouraging Middle School Mathematics Engagement and Persistence. School Science and Mathematics, 118(1–2), 4–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssm.12255

Bennett, R. E. (2011). Formative assessment: a critical review. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 18(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594x.2010.513678

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2018). Classroom assessment and pedagogy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy and Practice, 25(6), 551–575. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2018.1441807

Blažević, I. (2022). PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ EXPERIENCE IN THE PLANNING AND IMPLEMENTATION OF SUPPLEMENTARY TEACHING OF MATHEMATICS. Zbornik Instituta Za Pedagoska Istrazivanja, 54(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.2298/ZIPI2201027B

Brink, M., & Bartz, D. E. (2019). Effective use of formative assessment by high school teachers. Practical Assessment, Research, and Evaluation, 22(1), 8.

Brookhart, S. M. (2013). Grading. In SAGE Handbook of Research on Classroom Assessment (pp. 256–271). SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218649.n15

Brookhart, S. M., Moss, C. M., & Long, B. A. (2010). Teacher inquiry into formative assessment practices in remedial reading classrooms. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 17(1), 41–58. https://doi.org/10.1080/09695940903565545

Carreira, M. M. (2012). Formative Assessment in HL Teaching: Purposes, Procedures, and Practices. Heritage Language Journal, 9(1), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.46538/hlj.9.1.6

Chen, C. -h. (2010). The implementation and evaluation of a mobile self- and peer-assessment system. Computers and Education, 55(1), 229–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2010.01.008

Cizek, G. J., Andrade, H. L., & Bennett, R. E. (2019). Formative Assessment. In Handbook of Formative Assessment in the Disciplines (pp. 3–19). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315166933-1

Creswell, J. W. (2019). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (5th ed.). Sage publications.

Curry, K. A., Mwavita, M., Holter, A., & Harris, E. (2015). Getting assessment right at the classroom level: using formative assessment for decision making. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 28(1), 89–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11092-015-9226-5

Daga, A. T. (2021). Makna Merdeka Belajar dan Penguatan Peran Guru di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 7(3), 1075–1090. https://doi.org/10.31949/educatio.v7i3.1279

Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2012). Self-Determination Theory. In Handbook of Theories of Social Psychology: Volume 1 (pp. 416–437). SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n21

Deneen, C. C., & Hoo, H.-T. (2021). Connecting teacher and student assessment literacy with self-evaluation and peer feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(2), 214–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2021.1967284

Dungan, A. T., & Gronich Mundhenk, L. (2006). Student Self-Assessment: A Tool for Engaging Management Students in Their Learning. Organization Management Journal, 3(1), 54–73. https://doi.org/10.1057/omj.2006.7

Eva Ervia, Risma Delima Harahap, & Ika Chastanti. (2024). Analisis Perkembangan Kurikulum Biologi dari kurikulum 1984 Sampai dengan Kurikulum Merdeka. Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan, 13(1), 927–936. https://doi.org/10.58230/27454312.491

Fadlie, F. (2023). Relevansi Pemikiran Paulo Freire dan Ki Hajar Dewantara dalam Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. PenaEmas, 1(1), 45–54.

Festiyed, F., Mikhayla, M. E., Diliarosta, S., & Anggana, P. (2022). Pemahaman Guru Biologi SMA di Sekolah Penggerak DKI Jakarta terhadap Pendekatan Etnosains pada Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 152–163. https://doi.org/10.24832/jpnk.v7i2.2993

Gedamu, A. D., & Shewangizaw, G. L. (2020). Teachers’ Beliefs And Practices Of Cooperative Group Work Assessment: Selected Secondary School Teachers In Focus. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 45(11), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.202v45n11.1

Gefen, D., Endicott, J. E., Fresneda, J. E., Miller, J., & Larsen, K. R. (2017). A guide to text analysis with latent semantic analysis in R with annotated code: Studying online reviews and the stack exchange community. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 41(1), 21.

Hagos, T., & Andargie, D. (2023). Effects of technology-integrated formative assessment on students’ conceptual and procedural knowledge in chemical equilibrium. Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn), 17(1), 113–126. https://doi.org/10.11591/edulearn.v17i1.20630

Harahap, R. D., & Nazliah, R. (2019). Analisis Rencana Pelaksanaan Pembelajaran (Rpp) Biologi Kurikulum 2013 Kelas X Semester 1 Tahun Ajaran 2016/2017 Di Mas Islamiyah Gunting Saga Kualuh Selatan Kabupaten Labuhanbatu Utara. Jurnal Biolokus, 2(2), 194. https://doi.org/10.30821/biolokus.v2i2.536

Hargreaves, E. (2013). Inquiring into children’s experiences of teacher feedback: reconceptualising Assessment for Learning. Oxford Review of Education, 39(2), 229–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/03054985.2013.787922

Hargrove, R. A. (2012). Assessing the long-term impact of a metacognitive approach to creative skill development. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23(3), 489–517. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-011-9200-6

Harrison, C. (2009). Assessment for Learning – A Formative Approach to Classroom Practice. In International Handbook of Research and Development in Technology Education (pp. 449–459). BRILL. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789087908799_039

HARRISON, K., Ohara, J., & McNAMARA, G. (2015). Re-Thinking Assessment: Self- and Peer-Assessment as Drivers of Self-Direction in Learning. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 15(60), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.14689/ejer.2015.60.5

Haug, B. S., & Ødegaard, M. (2015). Formative Assessment and Teachers’ Sensitivity to Student Responses. International Journal of Science Education, 37(4), 629–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2014.1003262

Hill, H. C., Ball, D. L., & Schilling, S. G. (2008). Unpacking Pedagogical Content Knowledge: Conceptualizing and Measuring Teachers’ Topic-Specific Knowledge of Students. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 39(4), 372–400. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.39.4.0372

Hill, N. E., & Tyson, D. F. (2009). Parental involvement in middle school: a meta-analytic assessment of the strategies that promote achievement. Developmental Psychology, 45(3), 740–763. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015362

Huberman, A. (2014). Qualitative data analysis a methods sourcebook.

Huhta, A. (2008). Diagnostic and Formative Assessment. In The Handbook of Educational Linguistics (pp. 469–482). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470694138.ch33

Irons, A., & Elkington, S. (2021). Enhancing learning through formative assessment and feedback. books.google.com.

Jasiah, J., Mazrur, M., Hartati, Z., Rahman, A., Kibtiyah, M., Liadi, F., & Fahmi, F. (2024). Islamic Teachers’ Implementation of the Merdeka Curriculum in Senior High Schools: A Systematic Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 23(4), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.4.21

Kearney, S. (2013). Improving engagement: the use of ‘Authentic self-and peer-assessment for learning’ to enhance the student learning experience. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(7), 875–891. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2012.751963

Konopasek, L., Norcini, J., & Krupat, E. (2016). Focusing on the Formative: Building an Assessment System Aimed at Student Growth and Development. Academic Medicine, 91(11), 1492–1497. https://doi.org/10.1097/acm.0000000000001171

Lee, H. W., Lim, K. Y., & Grabowski, B. L. (2010). Improving self-regulation, learning strategy use, and achievement with metacognitive feedback. Educational Technology Research and Development, 58(6), 629–648. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-010-9153-6

Lee, I. (2007). Feedback in Hong Kong secondary writing classrooms: Assessment for learning or assessment of learning? Assessing Writing, 12(3), 180–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2008.02.003

Loima, J. (2019). Encouraging enough? A Case Study on Parental Feedback on New Assessment in Finnish Basic Education. International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies, 7(2), 189. https://doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.7n.2p.189

Lucariello, J., Tine, M. T., & Ganley, C. M. (2014). A formative assessment of students’ algebraic variable misconceptions. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 33, 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2013.09.001

Lyon, C. J., Nabors Oláh, L., & Caroline Wylie, E. (2019). Working toward integrated practice: Understanding the interaction among formative assessment strategies. The Journal of Educational Research, 112(3), 301–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2018.1514359

McCallum, S., & Milner, M. M. (2021). The effectiveness of formative assessment: student views and staff reflections. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher …. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1754761

Mohammed, Husam, S., & Kinyo, L. (2020). The role of constructivism in the enhancement of social studies education. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(7), 249–256. https://doi.org/10.31838/jcr.07.07.41

Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane‐Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self‐regulated learning: a model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070600572090

Ohri, A., & Ohri, A. (2013). Data Mining Using R. R for Business Analytics, 193–223.

Palmer, D. (2005). A Motivational View of Constructivist‐informed Teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 27(15), 1853–1881. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500690500339654

Panadero, E., Jonsson, A., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2016). Scaffolding Self-Regulated Learning Through Self-Assessment and Peer Assessment: Guidelines for Classroom Implementation. In Assessment for Learning: Meeting the Challenge of Implementation (pp. 311–326). Springer International Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39211-0_18

Phongsirikul, M. (2018). Traditional and Alternative Assessments in ELT: Students’ and Teachers’ Perceptions. REFLections, 25(1), 61–84. https://doi.org/10.61508/refl.v25i1.136267

Reeve, J. (2009). Why Teachers Adopt a Controlling Motivating Style Toward Students and How They Can Become More Autonomy Supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44(3), 159–175. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520903028990

Rombe, R., Rani, R., Nurlita, N., & Parinding, J. F. (2023). Differentiated Learning in Merdeka Belajar Curriculum According to Ki Hajar Dewantara in Christian Religious Education Subjects. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Keguruan, 1(6), 541–554.

Schildkamp, K., van der Kleij, F. M., Heitink, M. C., Kippers, W. B., & Veldkamp, B. P. (2020). Formative assessment: A systematic review of critical teacher prerequisites for classroom practice. International Journal of Educational Research, 103, 101602. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijer.2020.101602

Selvaraj, A. M., Azman, H., & Wahi, W. (2021). Teachers’ Feedback Practice and Students’ Academic Achievement: A Systematic Literature Review. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 20(1), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.20.1.17

Shute, V. J. (2008). Focus on Formative Feedback. Review of Educational Research, 78(1), 153–189. https://doi.org/10.3102/0034654307313795

Sihombing, A. A., Anugrahsari, S., Parlina, N., & Kusumastuti, Y. S. (2021). Merdeka Belajar in an Online Learning during The Covid-19 Outbreak: Concept and Implementation. Asian Journal of University Education, 17(4), 35–48. https://doi.org/10.24191/ajue.v17i4.16207

Simonson, M., Zvacek, S. M., & Smaldino, S. (2019). Teaching and learning at a distance: Foundations of distance education 7th edition. books.google.com.

Specia, A., & Osman, A. A. (2015). Education as a Practice of Freedom: Reflections on bell hooks. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(17), 195–199.

Stiggins, R., & DuFour, R. (2009). Maximizing the Power of Formative Assessments. Phi Delta Kappan, 90(9), 640–644. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172170909000907

Stokhof, H., de Vries, B., Bastiaens, T., & Martens, R. (2018). Using Mind Maps to Make Student Questioning Effective: Learning Outcomes of a Principle-Based Scenario for Teacher Guidance. Research in Science Education, 50(1), 203–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9686-3

Supovitz, J. (2009). Can high stakes testing leverage educational improvement? Prospects from the last decade of testing and accountability reform. Journal of Educational Change, 10(2–3), 211–227. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-009-9105-2

Supovitz, J. A., & Turner, H. M. (2000). The effects of professional development on science teaching practices and classroom culture. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(9), 963–980. https://doi.org/10.1002/1098-2736(200011)37:9<963::aid-tea6>3.0.co;2-0

Taufiqurrahman, T. (2016). Mengagas Pengelolaan Penilaian untuk Peningkatan Pembelajaran. Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Indonesia, 1(1), 119–134. https://doi.org/10.35316/jpii.v1i1.43

Tedesco, J. C., Opertti, R., & Amadio, M. (2014). The curriculum debate: Why it is important today. PROSPECTS, 44(4), 527–546. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11125-014-9326-x

van der Kleij, F. M. (2019). Comparison of teacher and student perceptions of formative assessment feedback practices and association with individual student characteristics. Teaching and Teacher Education, 85, 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2019.06.010

Wanner, T., & Palmer, E. (2018). Formative self-and peer assessment for improved student learning: the crucial factors of design, teacher participation and feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 43(7), 1032–1047. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2018.1427698

Wardani, N. E., Suwandi, S., & Ulya, C. (2023). Feasibility Assessment of Merdeka Curriculum in Bahasa Indonesia Digital Textbooks for Class VII Junior High Schools. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 13(12), 3268–3278. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1312.25

Watts, L., & Hodgson, D. (2015). Whole Curriculum Mapping of Assessment: Cartographies of Assessment and Learning. Social Work Education, 34(6), 682–699. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2015.1048217

Westbroek, H. B., van Rens, L., van den Berg, E., & Janssen, F. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1744044

Weurlander, M., Söderberg, M., Scheja, M., Hult, H., & Wernerson, A. (2012). Exploring formative assessment as a tool for learning: students’ experiences of different methods of formative assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(6), 747–760. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.572153

Wilder, S. (2013). Effects of parental involvement on academic achievement: a meta-synthesis. Educational Review, 66(3), 377–397. https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2013.780009

Wiliam, D. (2010). The role of formative assessment in effective learning environments. In Educational Research and Innovation (pp. 135–159). OECD. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264086487-8-en

Willey, K., & Gardner, A. (2010). Investigating the capacity of self and peer assessment activities to engage students and promote learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 35(4), 429–443. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2010.490577

Wongwatkit, C., Srisawasdi, N., Hwang, G.-J., & Panjaburee, P. (2017). Influence of an integrated learning diagnosis and formative assessment-based personalized web learning approach on students learning performances and perceptions. Interactive Learning Environments, 25(7), 889–903. https://doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2016.1224255

Yuhastina, Y., Parahita, B. N., Astutik, D., Ghufronudin, G., & Purwanto, D. (2020). Sociology teachers’ opportunities and challenges in facing “Merdeka Belajar” curriculum in the fourth industrial revolution (Industry 4.0). Society, 8(2), 732–753.

Zedan, R. (2021). Student feedback as a predictor of learning motivation, academic achievement and classroom climate. Education & Self Development, 16(2), 27–46. https://doi.org/10.26907/esd.16.2.03




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i2.6899

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Muh Fitrah, Muhammad Wajdi, Asrinan Asrinan, Rukiana Novianti Putri, Caly Setiawan, Anastasia Safroniou, Ruslan Ruslan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Eduscience (JES) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC - SA 4.0)