DEVELOPMENT OF TECHNOLOGY-BASED ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS IN SCIENCE LEARNING: A NARRATIVE REVIEW (2015-2025)

Yul Ifda Tanjung, Tiur Malasari Siregar, Suci Frisnoiry, Elfitra Elfitra, Taufiq Ramadhan, Abil Mansyur, Rizky Agassy Sihombing

Abstract


Purpose - This study critically synthesizes research on the development of technology-based assessment instruments in secondary science education (junior and senior high school) through a structured Narrative Literature Review (NLR). This review therefore identifies instrument types, implementation contexts, research dimensions examined, and learning impacts, while highlighting gaps in equity, teacher readiness, and longitudinal outcomes.

Methodology - Articles were systematically retrieved from Google Scholar and Mendeley within the 2015–2025 publication range using predefined keywords related to technology-based assessment and science learning. Inclusion criteria required peer-reviewed empirical studies focusing on secondary-level science and reporting instrument development or evaluation. Fourteen eligible articles were analyzed using structured content analysis, with emphasis on instrument characteristics, evidence of validity and reliability, implementation contexts, methodological approaches, and reported limitations.

Findings - The synthesis indicates that research predominantly centers on Computer-Based Testing (CBT), Computerized Adaptive Testing (CAT), gamified assessments, two-tier diagnostic tests, and LMS-based e-portfolios. Overall, these instruments demonstrate satisfactory validity and reliability and effectively measure higher-order thinking skills and conceptual understanding. They also enhance student motivation and accelerate feedback processes. However, most evidence is based on short-term, small-scale implementations, with limited attention to equity issues, teacher readiness, and sustained learning effects.

Contribution - This review integrates psychometric, pedagogical, and technological perspectives into a coherent analytical framework for technology-based assessment in science education. It clarifies existing research gaps and underscores the need for broader contextual validation, stronger methodological rigor, and the integration of learning analytics to ensure sustainable and evidence-based digital assessment practices.

Keywords


Assessment; Technology; Narrative Review; Science Learning

Full Text:

PDF

References


Abduljawad, M., & Ahmad, A. (2023). An analysis of mobile learning (M-Learning) in education. Multicultural Education, 9(2), 145–152.

Akram, M. (2019). Relationship between Students' Perceptions of Teacher Effectiveness and Student Achievement at Secondary School Level. Bulletin of Education and Research, 41(2), 93–108.

Alruwais, N., Wills, G., & Wald, M. (2018). Advantages and challenges of using e-assessment. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 8(1), 34–37.

Alsaadat, K. (2017). Mobile learning technologies. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering, 7(5), 2833.

Anestasya, F. F., Koto, I., & Setiawan, I. (2025). Implementation of Digital Assessment Based on the Learning Platform" Kahoot!" to Evaluate the Conceptual Understanding of Physics. Kasuari: Physics Education Journal (KPEJ), 8(1), 204–219.

Asriana, A., Auliah, A., & Hardin. (2023). Pengembangan alat evaluasi HOTS berbasis BOT Telegram pada materi larutan penyangga. Jurnal Pendidikan Kimia, 15(2), 122–131.

Bramer, W. M., de Jonge, G. B., Rethlefsen, M. L., Mast, F., & Kleijnen, J. (2018). A systematic approach to searching: An efficient and complete method to develop literature searches. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 106(4), 531–541.

Brown, S. (2019). Using assessment and feedback to empower students and enhance their learning. In Innovative assessment in higher education (pp. 50–63). Routledge.

Buyarski, C., & Landis, C. (2014). Using ePortfolios to assess applied learning. Peer Review, 16(1), 24–26.

Byrne, J. A. (2016). Improving the peer review of narrative literature reviews. Research integrity and peer review, 1(1), 12.

Caponetto, I., Earp, J., & Ott, M. (2021). Gamification and education: A literature review. Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106385.

Csapó, B., Ainley, J., Bennett, R. E., Latour, T., & Law, N. (2011). Technological issues for computer-based assessment. Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, 143-230.

Chen, D., Jeng, A., Sun, S., & Kaptur, B. (2023). Use of technology-based assessments: A systematic review covering over 30 countries. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 30(5-6), 396–428.

Dari, N. K. A. U., Numertayasa, I. W., & Pradnyana, P. B. (2025). Pengembangan Instrumen Evaluasi IPA Berbasis Platform Wordwall Untuk Siswa Kelas VI SDN 7 Manukaya Pada Materi Tata. Dharmas Education Journal (DE_Journal), 6(1), 224-234.

Destiana, D., Suchyadi, Y., & Anjaswuri, F. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Untuk Meningkatkan Kualitas Pembelajaran Produktif Di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pengajaran Guru Sekolah Dasar (JPPGuseda), 3(2), 119–123.

Dicheva, D., Dichev, C., Agre, G., & Angelova, G. (2019). Gamification in education: A systematic mapping study. Educational Technology & Society, 22(3), 75–88.

Elmahdi, I., Al-Hattami, A., & Fawzi, H. (2018). Using Technology for Formative Assessment to Improve Students' Learning. Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology-TOJET, 17(2), 182–188.

Endang Sri Maruti, Naniek Kusumawati. (2018). Proses Pengembangan Asesmen Alternatif Berupa Penilaian Poduk pada Mata Kuliah Pmebelajaran Bahasa Jawa di SD. Jurnal pendidikan dasar perkhasa. Volume 4 Nomor 2.

Faradisa, B. T. Z. V., Kurniasih, S., & Berlian, L. (2024). Pengembangan instrumen tes 4TMC CBT pada materi sistem pernapasan untuk mengukur berpikir kritis siswa SMP kelas VIII. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. 14(4), 909–918.

Firmansyah, S., Chandra, E., & Aripin, I. (2019). Pengembangan e-portfolio sebagai assessment pembelajaran biologi. Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Indonesia, 5(1), 45–53.

Fitriani, F., Pratikto, H., Rahayu, W. P., & Prabowo, A. E. (2024). Pengembangan Instrumen Assessment Pembelajaran Hots Menggunakan iSpring Suite. Research and Development Journal of Education, 10(2), 695-707.

Furunes, T. (2019). Reflections on systematic reviews: Moving golden standards? Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism, 19(3), 227–231.

Gikandi, J. W., Morrow, D., & Davis, N. E. (2011). Online formative assessment in higher education: A review of the literature. Computers & Education, 57(4), 2333–2351.

Haddaway, N. R., Woodcock, P., Macura, B., & Collins, A. (2015). Making literature reviews more reliable through the application of lessons from systematic reviews. Conservation biology, 29(6), 1596–1605.

Han, X. (2025). Associations between the effectiveness of blended learning, student engagement, student learning outcomes, and student academic motivation in higher education. Education and Information Technologies, 30(8), 10535-10565.

Hani, M. R., Riyoko, E., & Fakhrudin, A. (2020). Efektivitas Strategi Pembelajaran Menyenangkan Berbasis Quantum Teaching And Learning terhadap Hasil Belajar Siswa Kelas V SD Negeri 35 Palembang. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling (JPDK), 5(1), 1117–1128.

Harahap, R. D., Bangun, B., & Siregar, S. U. (2025). The effectiveness of IMLO Biology media in enhancing students ’ learning motivation under the Merdeka Curriculum. 8(2), 184–191. DOI : 10.30821/biolokus.v8i2.4796

Hasyim, M., Swandi, A., Rahmadhanningsih, S., Taqwin, M., Virisi, S. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Pembelajaran Fisika dengan Model PenemuanTerbimbing Berbantuan Simulasi Interaktif dan Dampaknya Terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Pendidikan Fisika, 8(1), 15-23.

Ihsan, M. S., Hadisaputra, S., Ramdani, A., & Al Idrus, A. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Pemahaman Konsep Berbasis Komputer pada Pembelajaran Kimia. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan dan Sains, 1(1), 26-29.

Istiyono, E. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian dan Analisis Hasil Belajar Fisika (Edisi II). UNY Press.

Istiyono, E., Dwandaru, W. S. B., Setiawan, R., & Megawati, I. (2020). Developing Computerized Adaptive Testing to Measure Physics Higher Order Thinking Skills of Senior High School Students and Its Feasibility of Use. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(1), 91-101.

Jahan, N., Naveed, S., Zeshan, M., & Tahir, M. A. (2016). How to conduct a systematic review: a narrative literature review. Cureus, 8(11).

Jimada-Ojuolape, B., & Teh, J. (2020). Impact of the integration of information and communication technology on power system reliability: A review. IEEE Access, 8, 24600-24615.

Kibble, J. D. (2017). Best practices in online assessment: Principles, process, and implementation. Advances in Physiology Education, 41(1), 110–119.

Kolen, M. J., & Brennan, R. L. (2014). Test equating, scaling, and linking: Methods and practices (3rd ed.). Springer.

Lestari, S. M., Sjaifuddin, S., & Resti, V. D. A. (2022). Pengembangan instrumen soal lomba cerdas cermat IPA SMP berbasis ICT (information and communication technology) dengan aplikasi quizizz. PENDIPA Journal of Science Education, 6(2), 531–540.

Molnár, G. (2021). Challenges and developments in technology-based assessment: possibilities in science education. Europhysics News, 52(2), 16-19.

Morris, R., Perry, T., & Wardle, L. (2021). Formative assessment and feedback for learning in higher education: A systematic review. Review of Education, 9(3), e3292.

Nicol, D. (2021). The power of internal feedback: Exploiting natural comparison processes. Assessment & Evaluation in higher education, 46(5), 756–778.

Haka, N. B., Hamid, A., Nurhidayah, N., Kesumawardhani, A. D., Rudhini, M., & Riski, R. A. (2019). Pengembangan instrumen evaluasi two-tier multiple choice terhadap literasi sains berbantuan personal computer. Biosfer: Jurnal Tadris Biologi, 10(2), 201–214.

Nugraha, E. N. L., Salsabila, S., & Ramadhiani, T. S. (2021, March). Implementing an online quiz application in the EFL classroom. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Education of Suryakancana.

Nurdiyanti, N., Sukarmin, S., & Budiharti, R. (2022). Pengembangan Media Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Moodle Pada Materi Gelombang Bunyi. Jurnal Materi dan Pembelajaran Fisika, 12(1), 22-28.

O'Leary, M., Scully, D., Karakolidis, A., & Pitsia, V. (2018). The state‐of‐the‐art in digital technology‐based assessment. European Journal of Education, 53(2), 160–175.

O'Connor, A., & Sargeant, J. (2015). Research synthesis in veterinary science: narrative reviews, systematic reviews and meta-analysis. The Veterinary Journal, 206(3), 261–267.

Pals, F. F., Tolboom, J. L., & Suhre, C. J. (2023). Development of a formative assessment instrument to determine students’ need for corrective actions in physics: Identifying students’ functional level of understanding. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 50, 101387.

Pautasso, M. (2019). The structure and conduct of a narrative literature review. A guide to the scientific career: Virtues, communication, research, and academic writing, 299–310.

Polanin, J. R., Pigott, T. D., Espelage, D. L., & Grotpeter, J. K. (2019). Best practice guidelines for abstract screening of ample-evidence systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Research Synthesis Methods, 10(3), 330–342.

Prendes-Espinosa, M. P., Gutiérrez-Porlán, I., & García-Tudela, P. A. (2020). Collaborative work in higher education: Tools and strategies to implement the e-assessment. In Workgroups eassessment: Planning, implementing and analysing frameworks (pp. 55-84). Singapore: Springer Singapore.

Rachma, N. M. A. (2015). Pengembangan Tes Elektronik (E-test) Berbasis Komputer Pada Materi Bioteknologi Di SMA Negeri 1 Surabaya (Doctoral dissertation, State University of Surabaya).

Redecker, C. (2017). European framework for the digital competence of educators (DigCompEdu). Publications Office of the European Union.

Rostaminezhad, M. A. (2019). Students' perceptions of the strengths and limitations of electronic tests, focusing on instant feedback. Journal of Information Technology Education. Research, 18, 59.

Saleem, T. A. (2011). Mobile learning technology: A new step in e-learning. Journal of theoretical and applied information technology, 34(2), 125–137.

Santoso, A., Kartianom, K., & Kassymova, G. K. (2019). Kualitas Butir Bank Soal Statistika (Studi kasus: Instrumen Ujian Akhir Mata Kuliah Statistika Universitas Terbuka). Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Matematika, 6(2), 165–176.

Soamole, S., Amiroh, D., & Salim, A. (2024). Pengembangan e-formative assessment pada materi suhu dan kalor untuk meningkatkan hasil belajar fisika dengan balikan video tik tok. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA. 8(2), 2–5.

Sari, D. R. U., Wahyuni, S., & Bachtiar, R. W. (2018). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Multiple Choice High Order Thinking Padapembelajaran Fisika Berbasis E-Learning Di Sma. Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 7(1), 100-

Setiyorini, S. R., & Lestari, W. (2023). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes pada Materi Kesetimbangan Kimia Kelas XI Berbasis Android. Jurnal Teknologi Pendidikan, 1(2), 15-15.

Shute, V. J., & Rahimi, S. (2017). Review of computer‐based assessment for learning in elementary and secondary education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(1), 1–19.

Shute, V. J., Leighton, J. P., Jang, E. E., & Chu, M. W. (2016). Advances in the science of assessment. Educational Assessment, 21(1), 34–59.

Siregar, T. M., Agustina, N., Siahaan, F. B., Sinaga, L. L., Prabawa, I., & Sagala, R. Z. (2024). Analisis Validitas dan Reliabilitas Butir Soal Pilihan Ganda Dalam Mata Pelajaran Matematika Kelas 12 Semester Genap di SMAN 1 Adiankoting. AR-RUMMAN: Journal of Education and Learning Evaluation, 1(2), 725–730.

Solihin, A. (2022). Penerapan Supervisi Akademik Kepala Sekolah dalam Peningkatan Kemampuan Guru Menyusun Penilaian Pembelajaran Ahmad. Meretas : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, 9(2), 77–88.

Soto Rodriguez, E. A., Fernández Vilas, A., & Díaz Redondo, R. P. (2021). Impact of computer-based assessments on the Science ranks of secondary students. Applied Sciences, 11(13), 6169.

Suhaila, A., Sani, R., & Zul, A. (2024). Analisis tingkat miskonsepsi siswa MAN Binjai pada materi suhu dan kalor menggunakan three-tier multiple choice diagnostik test. Jurnal KARST (Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika dan Terapannya), 1(1), 1-8.

Supardi, S. (2015). Penilaian Autentik Pembelajaran Efektif, Kognitif, dan Psikomotor: Konsep dan Aplikasi.

Supriyati, Y., Iriyadi, D., & Falani, I.. (2021). The development of an equating application for computer-based tests in the physics HOTS category. Journal of Technology and Science Education, 11(1), 117-128.

Syahidah, N., Kusasi, M., Analita, R. N., & Sholahuddin, A. (2024). Pengembangan E-Instrumen Tes Materi Stoikiometri Menggunakan Blooket Game Untuk Mengukur Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Pada Siswa Sma. JCAE (Journal of Chemistry And Education), 7(3), 161–174.]

Tanjung, Y. I., Abubakar, Dewi W., dan Rajo, H. L. (2020). Kajian Pengetahuan Konseptual (Teori & Soal). Bandung: Media Sains Indonesia.

Tanjung, Y. I., Wulandari, T., Festiyed, F., Yerimadesi, Y., & Ahda, Y. (2023). Development analysis of creative thinking test instruments on natural science materials. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika. 12(1), 22-27.

Tanjung, Y. I., Wulandari, D., Bakar, A., & Ramadhani, I. (2021, March). The Development of an Online Physics Test System at SMA CT Foundation Medan. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1819, No. 1, p. 012054). IOP Publishing.

Tanjung, Y. I., Azhar, M., Razak, A., Yohandri, Y., Arsih, F., Wulandari, T., ... & Lubis, R. H. (2023). State of The Art Review: Building Computational Thinking on Science Education. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 19(1), 65-75.

Yul Ifda Tanjung, Festiyed, Skunda Diliarosta, Asrizal, Fitri Arsih, and Muhammad Aizri Fadillah, "Developing the Physics Learning Management System (PLMS) to Support Blended Learning Models," International Journal of Information and Education Technology, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 18-29, 2025.

van der Linden, W. J., & Pashley, P. J. (2010). Item selection and ability estimation in adaptive testing. In W. J. van der Linden & C. A. W. Glas (Eds.), Elements of adaptive testing (pp. 3–30). Springer.

Zhao, F., Yu, S., & Wang, L. (2020). Mobile learning and its effectiveness in higher education. Computers & Education, 159, 104013.

Zlatkin-Troitschanskaia, O., Kuhn, C., Brückner, S., & Leighton, J. P. (2019). Evaluating a technology-based assessment (TBA) to measure teachers’ action-related and reflective skills. International Journal of Testing, 19(2), 148-171




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v13i1.8226

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Yul Ifda Tanjung

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Eduscience (JES) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC - SA 4.0)