ANALYSIS OF CONTEXTUAL PROBLEM-SOLVING INSTRUCTION IN THE CONSTRUCTION OF ELEMENTARY STUDENTS’ MATHEMATICAL CONCEPTUAL UNDERSTANDING

Yuhanita Ulzana, Mohamad Syahri, Mohammad Syaifuddin

Abstract


Purpose – This study aims to analyze contextual problem-solving instruction as a pedagogical space for constructing elementary students' mathematical conceptual reasoning in whole-number learning. The study focuses on how authentic problems, everyday-life contexts, and instructional interaction facilitate students' construction of conceptual meaning and their explanation of the rationale for using arithmetic operations.

Methodology – This study employed a field-based qualitative case study approach. Researchers collected data through classroom observations, interviews with the school principal, teacher, and selected students, document analysis, and pretest–posttest measures as supporting descriptive data. Data were analyzed through data reduction, data display, and conclusion drawing, while trustworthiness was ensured through source, technique, and time triangulation.

Findings – The findings show that contextual problem-solving instruction created a learning space that enabled students to actively, reflectively, and meaningfully construct mathematical conceptual reasoning. Through simple buying-and-selling contexts, the use of play money, group discussion, and reflection, students were able to identify information, select solution strategies, explain the rationale for using addition and subtraction, and relate whole-number concepts to real-life situations.

Contribution – This study confirms that contextual problem-solving instruction should be understood not merely as a strategy for improving learning outcomes, but as a pedagogical space that facilitates the construction of students’ mathematical conceptual reasoning through authentic experience, social interaction, and reflection on thinking processes.

Keywords


contextual problem solving, construction of mathematical conceptual reasoning, elementary mathematics learning, whole numbers, authentic context.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmed, S. K. (2024). The pillars of trustworthiness in qualitative research. Journal of Medicine, Surgery, and Public Health, 2, 100051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.glmedi.2024.100051

Arikunto, S. (2013). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi 2). Bumi Aksara.

Ariyani, A. I., Cahyo, H., Nisa, A. F., & Cahyani, B. H. (2025). Enhancing elementary students’ conceptual understanding and interest in numbers through role play and menu-based mathematics activities. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 17(4), 6350–6361. https://doi.org/10.35445/alishlah.v17i4.7587

Ayari, M. A., Sellami, A., Santhosh, M. E., Naji, K. K., Al-Ali, A., & Al-Hazbi, S. M. A. (2025). From performance problems: A systematic review of problem-based learning in K–12 mathematics. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1731307. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2025.1731307

Budiman, M. A., Nimah, N., & Bozorov, M. N. (2025). Enhancing elementary mathematics learning through contextual teaching and regalia: A case study in Blora, Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar, 3(1). https://doi.org/10.47134/pgsd.v3i1.2298

Chand, S. P. (2025). Methods of data collection in qualitative research: Interviews, focus groups, observations, and document analysis. Advances in Educational Research and Evaluation, 6(1), 303–317. https://doi.org/10.25082/AERE.2025.01.001

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE.

Dahal, N. (2025). Qualitative data analysis: Reflections, procedures, and some points for consideration. Frontiers in Research Metrics and Analytics, 10, 1669578. https://doi.org/10.3389/frma.2025.1669578

Hall, S., & Liebenberg, L. (2024). Qualitative description as an introductory method to qualitative research for master 's-level students and research trainees. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 23, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069241242264

Jäder, J., & Johansson, H. (2025). Exploring students’ conceptual understanding through mathematical problem solving: Students’ use of and shift between different representations of rational numbers. Research in Mathematics Education. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2025.2456840

Johnson, E. B. (2002). Contextual Teaching and Learning: What It Is and Why It Is Here to Stay. Corwin Press.

Lochmiller, C. R., Cho, Y., & Lester, J. N. (2026). Designing trustworthy qualitative HRD research: Methodological considerations. Human Resource Development Review. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/15344843261419651

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2016). Qualitative Research: A Guide to Design and Implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE.

Nurhaswinda, N., Ningsih, S. K., Hidayanti, E. N., Anggraini, N., Mutiara, R. I., Mukhbita, A., Sitompul, T. A., Zahra, N. A., Natania, M. L., & Saputra, I. (2025). Issues faced by elementary school students in solving problem-solving questions in mathematics. TOFEDU: The Future of Education Journal, 4(7), 3523–3529. https://doi.org/10.61445/tofedu.v4i7.819

Rindana, E. S., & Panggabean, E. M. (2022). Penerapan teori konstruktivisme pada pembelajaran matematika. Journal of Mathematics in Teaching and Learning, 1(1), 32–38.

Sa’diah, L. S., & Nahdi, D. S. (2023). Model pembelajaran kontekstual untuk membantu pemecahan masalah matematis. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidik Indonesia, 2(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.56916/jipi.v2i1.277

Sari, N. P., Yufiarti, & Makmur. (2021). Matematika realistik meningkatkan pemahaman siswa tentang konsep pembagian di sekolah dasar. Jurnal Imiah Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran, 5(1), 143–154. https://doi.org/10.23887/jipp.v5i1.33338

Suhermi, L., Barokah, N., & Kamal, R. (2025). Pembelajaran kontekstual sebagai inovasi kreatif dalam menjadikan materi ajar lebih bermakna. 4(2), 94–103.

Surata, I. K., & Marhaeni, I. G. A. A. N. D. (2019). Pendekatan contextual teaching and learning (CTL) berbasis lembar kerja peserta didik (LKS) untuk meningkatkan aktivitas belajar biologi. 4(24). https://doi.org/10.34289/292826

Xu, Z., Wang, Y., & Qian, Y. (2025). The design and application of in-depth interviews in primary care research. Chinese General Practice Journal, 2(2), 100062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgpj.2025.100062

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case Study Research and Applications: Design and Methods (6th ed.). SAGE.

Yunitasari, F., Sintawati, M., & Mastul, A.-R. H. (2023). The application of contextual teaching and learning for increasing learning outcomes and reducing anxiety in elementary school mathematics. International Journal of Learning Reformation in Elementary Education, 2(2), 77–85. https://doi.org/10.56741/ijlree.v2i02.283




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v13i3.9165

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Yuhanita Ulzana, Mohamad Syahri, mohammad syaifuddin

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Eduscience (JES) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC - SA 4.0)