Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Design Thinking in Action: How Pre-Service Biology Teachers Represent Abstract Concepts Through Learning Media
Abstract
Background: The development of biology learning media requires pedagogical skills, conceptual understanding, and representation skills. However, research examining how pre-service teachers integrate these three elements in the design thinking process to develop learning media is still very limited. This study aims to identify the types of biological concepts chosen by pre-service biology teachers in the development of learning media, investigate how they represent abstract biological concepts, and analyze their thinking process in designing learning media. Methodology: The study employed a concurrent mixed-methods design to examine pre-service biology teachers’ design thinking through analysis of blueprints and photos of learning media developed by seven groups; data were coded for concept types, representation types, and design thinking processes, with only concept types analyzed quantitatively using percentage calculations across groups. Findings: The results showed that the types of biological concepts selected were structure, system, and process. The consistency of all groups in using visual representations, symbols, and narratives for all types of concepts demonstrates the pedagogical awareness of pre-service biology teachers regarding the importance of integrating multiple representations to support meaningful concept understanding. From a design thinking perspective, students went through the stages of empathy, defining problems, generating ideas, and selecting the media to be developed. Contributions: This study shows that pre-service biology teachers have developed representational competence, but they still tend to prioritize visual appeal over conceptual support. These findings recommend strengthening pre-service biology teachers’ skills in designing learning media that promote deep conceptual understanding, not merely visual appeal
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Computers & Education, 33(2), 131–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9
Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction, 16(3), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001
Albay, E., & Eisma, D. (2025). Using design thinking for developing pre-service teachers’ creativity in designing teaching plans to promote interactive learning in mathematics. Learning and Instruction. 98, 102070 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.102070
Baran, E., & Alzoubi, D. (2023). Design thinking in teacher education: Morphing preservice teachers’ mindsets and conceptualizations. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 56, 496–514. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2023.2170932
Belotto, M. J. (2018). Data analysis methods for qualitative research: Managing the challenges of coding, interrater reliability, and thematic analysis. Qualitative Report, 23(11), 2622–2633. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2018.3492
Castro-Alonso, J. C., de Koning, B. B., Fiorella, L., & Paas, F. (2021). Five Strategies for Optimizing Instructional Materials: Instructor- and Learner-Managed Cognitive Load. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1379–1407. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-021-09606-9
Çeken, B., & Taşkın, N. (2022). Multimedia learning principles in different learning environments: a systematic review. Smart Learning Environments, 9(19), 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00200-2
Chatzikyriakidou, K., Tacloban, M.-J., Concepcion, K., Geiger, J., & McCartney, M. (2021). Student Association of Lecture Content with the Five Core Concepts of Biology: Novel Results from an Introductory Biology Course. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 22(2), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00105-21
Chen, Q., Shuai, W., Zhang, J., Sun, Z., & Cao, N. (2024). Beyond Numbers: Creating Analogies to Enhance Data Comprehension and Communication with Generative AI. Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 377, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3613904.3642480
Christensen, D., & Lombardi, D. (2024). Computational thinking through the lens of biological evolution learning: enhancing understanding through the levels of biological organization and computational complexity. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 17(1), 1–31. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12052-024-00202-3
Cromley, J. (2020). Learning from Multiple Representations. Handbook of Learning from Multiple Representations and Perspectives. First Edition. Newyork: Routledge https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429443961-6
Uminski, C., Wright, L. K., & Newman, D. L. (2025). Sketchy understandings: drawings reveal where students may need additional support to understand scale and abstraction in common representations of DNA. Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education, 26(2), e00070-25. https://doi.org/10.1128/jmbe.00070-25
Eamcharoen, P. (2024). Design Thinking For Creating Educational Innovations For Teachers In The Digital Age. Journal Of Industrial Education. 23(2), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.55003/jie.23203
Feriyanto, F., & Anjariyah, D. (2024). Deep Learning Approach Through Meaningful, Mindful, and Joyful Learning: A Library Research. Electronic Journal of Education, Social Economics and Technology, 5(2), 208–212. https://doi.org/10.33122/ejeset.v5i2.321
Fernández-Fontecha, A., O’Halloran, K., Tan, S., & Wignell, P. (2019). A multimodal approach to visual thinking: the scientific sketchnote. Visual Communication, 18, 29–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470357218759808
Forbus, K., Hinrichs, T., & Rabkina, I. (2018). Building Analogy Systems : Some Lessons Learned. https://consensus.app/papers/building-analogy-systems-some-lessons-learned-forbus-hinrichs/32648587e6e1572c858c7a006f8249a4/
Gilissen, M. G. R., Knippels, M. C. P. J., & van Joolingen, W. R. (2021). Fostering students’ understanding of complex biological systems. CBE Life Sciences Education, 20(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.20-05-0088
Hasanah, R., & Jumini, S. (2025). Analysis of the Influence of Using Learning Media in Increasing Students’ Learning Motivation. Indonesian Journal of Innovation in Education Reasearch. 1(2), 45-52. https://doi.org/10.63980/ijier.v1i2.72
Hidayati, K., Rahmawati, A., & Wijayanto, D. (2024). Development of Learning Media to Improve Critical Thinking Skills and Creativity of Vocational Students. International Journal of Social Service and Research. 4(3), 716-724. https://doi.org/10.46799/ijssr.v4i03.741
Jackson, J., Ritsos, P. D., Butcher, P. W. S., & Roberts, J. C. (2025). Path-Based Design Model for Constructing and Exploring Alternative Visualisations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 31(1), 1158–1168. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2024.3456323
Kelley, D., & Brown, T. (2018). An introduction to Design Thinking. Institute of Design at Stanford, 6. https://dschool-old.stanford.edu/sandbox/groups/designresources/wiki/36873/attachments/74b3d/ModeGuideBOOTCAMP2010L.pdf
Khowim. (2024). Systematic Review of Development Methods and Effectiveness of Digital PAI Learning Media. World of Immersive Learning, 1(1), 31–42. https://doi.org/10.63914/wirl.v1i1.4
Kusmahardhika, N., Mahanal, S., Balqis, B., Faridha, H. A. G., & Ramadhan, B. H. (2024). Research Trends in The Development of Biology Learning Media in Indonesia: A Bibliometric Analysis. Jurnal Eksakta Pendidikan (Jep), 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.24036/jep/vol8-iss1/873
Lankers, A., Timm, J., & Schmiemann, P. (2023). Students’ systems thinking while modeling a dynamic ecological system. Frontiers in Education. 8, 1187237. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1187237
Lubis, L. H., Febriani, B., Yana, R. F., Azhar, A., & Darajat, M. (2023). The Use of Learning Media and its Effect on Improving the Quality of Student Learning Outcomes. International Journal of Education, Social Studies, And Management (IJESSM). 3(2), 7–14. https://doi.org/10.52121/ijessm.v3i2.148
Maduratna, M., & Jayanti, U. N. A. D. (2022). Visual Representation of Biology Books on Circulatory System Material. Bioeduscience, 6(2), 124–136. https://doi.org/10.22236/j.bes/629415
Martin, F., & Bolliger, D. U. (2022). Developing an online learner satisfaction framework in higher education through a systematic review of research. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(50), 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-022-00355-5
Mayer, R. E. (2017). Using multimedia for e-learning. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 33(5), 403–423. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12197
McDaniel, M. A., Cahill, M. J., Frey, R. F., Limeri, L. B., & Lemons, P. P. (2022). Learning Introductory Biology: Students’ Concept-Building Approaches Predict Transfer on Biology Exams. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 21(4), ar65. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-12-0335
Mertens, D. M. (2009). Research and Evaluation in Education and Psychology_ Integrating Diversity With Quantitative, Qualitative, and Mixed Methods. NY: SAGE Publications, Inc. 553 page.
Mystakidis, S., Berki, E., & Valtanen, J. (2021). Deep and Meaningful E-Learning with Social Virtual Reality Environments in Higher Education: A Systematic Literature Review. Applied Sciences. 11(5), 2412. https://doi.org/10.3390/app11052412
Nadeem, M., Oroszlányová, M., & Farag, W. (2023). Effect of Digital Game-Based Learning on Student Engagement and Motivation. Comput., 12, 177. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers12090177
Narguizian, P. J. (2025). A Pedagogical Proposal for Enhancing Undergraduate Biology Education through Complex Systems Thinking (CST). Journal of Big History, 8(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.22339/jbh.v8i1.8109
Novak, E., & Mulvey, B. K. (2021). Enhancing design thinking in instructional technology students. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 37(1), 80–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/jcal.12470
Panke, S. (2019). Design Thinking in Education: Perspectives, Opportunities and Challenges. Open Education Studies, 1, 281–306. https://doi.org/10.1515/edu-2019-0022
Reyes, R., & Villanueva, J. (2024). Narrative-Based Concept Representations: Fostering Visual Cognition in the Introductory Chemistry Classroom. Journal of Chemical Education. 101(3), 1106–1119 https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jchemed.3c01151
Sæleset, J., & Friedrichsen, P. (2021). Pre-service Science Teachers’ Pedagogical Content Knowledge Integration of Students’ Understanding in Science and Instructional Strategies. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 17(5), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/10859
Saputri, R. P., Yulastri, A., Ganefri, Giatman, M., Irfan, D., & Effendi, H. (2025). Impact of Interactive Media Utilization on Enhancing Learning Outcomes: Meta-Analysis. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA, 11(3), 40–49. https://doi.org/10.29303/jppipa.v11i3.10438
Sheredos, B., & Bechtel, W. (2017). Sketching Biological Phenomena and Mechanisms. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9(4), 970–985. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12290
Tao, Y., & Tao, Y. (2024). Integrating Aesthetic Education in Quality Education: A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development Perspectives. Sustainability (Switzerland), 16(2), 855. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16020855
Thyberg, A., Schönborn, K., & Gericke, N. (2024). Investigating students’ meaning-making of multiple visual representations of epigenetics at different levels of biological organisation. International Journal of Science Education, 46(14), 1405–1431. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2023.2289175
Torkar, G. (2017). Multiple Representations in Biological Education, Models and Modeling in Science Education. CEPS Journal : Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 7, 171. https://consensus.app/papers/multiple-representations-in-biological-education-models-torkar/7250cb07caab5ce2a4158f04777bac19/
Treagust, D., Chittleborough, G., & Mamiala, T. (2003). The role of submicroscopic and symbolic representations in chemical explanations. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1353–1368. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000070306
Uminski, C., Newman, D. L., & Wright, L. K. (2025). Probing Visual Literacy Skills Reveals Unexpected Student Conceptions of Chromosomes. CBE Life Sciences Education, 24(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-07-0176
Waugh, A. H., Green, K. E., & Andrews, T. C. (2025). How do Early-career Biology Faculty Develop Pedagogical Content Knowledge? Exploring Variation and Longitudinal Development. CBE Life Sciences Education, 24(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.24-08-0211
Wright, L. K., Cardenas, J. J., Liang, P., & Newman, D. L. (2018). Arrows in biology: Lack of clarity and consistency points to confusion for learners. CBE Life Sciences Education, 17(1), 1-13. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.17-04-0069
Ye, J., Dash, A., Yin, W., & Wang, G. (2025). Beyond End-to-End VLMs: Leveraging Intermediate Text Representations for Superior Flowchart Understanding. 3534–3548. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2025.naacl-long.180
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jpbn.v12i1.8867
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2026 Kintan Limiansi, Ema Aprilisa, Anggi Tias Pratama, Kintan Limiansih
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal Pembelajaran dan Biologi Nukleus (JPBN) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - SA 4.0). Official contact: Rivo +6281362238917