FRAUD RISK ASSESSMENT, AUDIT EXPERIENCE, AND AUDIT QUALITY: THE MODERATING ROLE OF PROFESSIONAL SKEPTICISM
Abstract
PURPOSE - This paper aims to examine the effect of fraud risk assessment and audit experience on audit quality, with professional skepticism as a moderating variable, in Public Accounting Firms in Medan City. The study is based on the background of declining audit quality caused by weak fraud risk assessment, limited auditor experience, and low professional skepticism, which have led to audit failures and sanctions.
METHODOLOGY - This study used a quantitative associative design with purposive sampling of 105 auditors from Public Accounting Firms in Medan City. Data were collected through Likert-scale questionnaires covering fraud risk assessment, audit experience, audit quality, and professional skepticism, which were tested for validity and reliability. The responses were analyzed using Structural Equation Modeling–Partial Least Squares (SEM-PLS) with SmartPLS.
FINDING - The study found that fraud risk assessment and audit experience both positively affect audit quality. Professional skepticism further strengthens these effects, highlighting its crucial role in ensuring reliable and credible audits.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
(IAASB)., International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. 2019. International Standard on Auditing 200: Overall Objectives of the Independent Auditor and the Conduct of an Audit in Accordance with International Standards on Auditing.
Abdullah, S. A., & Ali, S. A. 2021. “‘The Impact of Auditor Experience on Audit Quality: Evidence from Emerging Markets.’” Finance, International Journal of Accounting And 2(31):115– 32.
Agoes, Sukrisno. 2012. “Auditing: Petunjuk Praktis Pemeriksaan Akuntan Oleh Akuntan Publik”. Jilid 1, Edisi 4, Jakarta: Salemba Empat.
Aquelis Alves Barreto. 2023. “Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor Dan Etika Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntansi Publik (KAP) Surabaya.” Jurnal Mutiara Ilmu Akuntansi 1(4):158–70. doi:10.55606/jumia.v1i4.2022.
Arens, A. A ; Elder, R. J; & Beasley, M. S. 2014. Auditing and Assurance Services: An Integrated Approach. Pearson.
Arnita, Vina; Diana, Yana; Puspita Sari, Andini. 2023. Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Di KAP. Vol. 4.
Aziza, Ismi, Muhammad Ahyaruddin, and Della Hilia Anriva. 2023. “Pengaruh Pengalaman Audit, Skeptisme Profesional, Dan Tekanan Waktu Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Dalam Mendeteksi Kecurangan.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Ekonomi, Bisnis & Akuntansi 3:56–69.
Chin, W. W. 1998. The Partial Least Squares Approach for Structural Equation Modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modern Methods for Business Research (Pp. 295-336). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Cressey, D. R. 2015. Other People’s Money: A Study in the Social Psychology of Embezzlement. Transaction Publishers.
DeAngelo, L. E. 1981. “Auditor Size and Audit Quality.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 3:183–99.
DeFond, M. L., & Zhang, J. 2014. “A Review of Archival Auditing Research.” Journal of Accounting and Economics 58(2-3):275-326.
Djatu Winardi, Rijadh, Arizona Mustikarini, and Yoga Permana. 2017. “Do Auditor Professional Scepticism and Client Narcissism Affect Fraud Risk Assessment?” The Indonesian doi:10.33312/ijar.347. Journal of Accounting Research 20(1):71–98.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. 1981. “Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable Variables and Measurement Error.” Journal of Marketing Research 1(18):39–50. 108 109 Francis, J. R. 2004. “What Do We Know about Audit Quality?” The British Accounting Review 4:345–68.
Ghosh, A., & Moon, D. 2018. “Auditor Tenure and Perceptions of Audit Quality.” The Accounting Review 2:585-612.
Ghozali, I. 2011. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 19. Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Ginting, Noya Andiana. 2024. “Mengukur Kualitas Audit: Peran Pengalaman, Kompetensi, Skeptisisme Dan Etika Auditor Di Kap Medan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Manajemen, Ekonomi, doi:10.31955/mea.v8i2.4147. & Akuntansi (MEA) 8(2):1109–26.
Gul, F. A., Chen, C. J. P., & Tsui, J. S. L. 2020. “‘Auditor Experience and the Quality of Audit: A Study of Chinese Firms.’” Journal of International Accounting Research 2(19):91–107. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. 2010. Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Hair Jr, Joseph F., Marko Sarstedt, Christian M. Ringle, and Siegfried P. Gudergan. 2017. Advanced Issues In Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling. Sage Publications.
Handayani, Suratno, Yetty Murni, Harnovinsah, and Syahril Djaddang. 2024. “The Determinant Effect of Internal Audit Quality With Fraud Prevention Coordination as Mediation.” JPAK: Jurnal Pendidikan Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 12(1):69–81. https://ejournal.upi.edu/index.php/JPAK/article/view/64222.
Hantono. 2020. Metodologi Penelitian Skripsi Dengan Aplikasi SPSS. Yogyakarta: CV. Budi Utama.
Hasan Lisa, Daud Muhammad, Aryansi Cici. 2024. “Effect of Auditor Ethics, Audit Experience, and Auditor Motivation on Internal Audit Quality.” Shafin: Sharia Finance and Accounting Journal 4(1):72–84. doi:10.19105/sfj.v4i1.12772.
Hayes, R., Dassen, R., Schilder, A., & Wallage, P. 2005. Principles of Auditing: An Introduction to International Standards on Auditing. Pearson Education.
Herawati, Tuti, and Selly Siti Selfia. 2019. “Tinjauan Indikator Kualitas Audit.” Prosiding FRIMA (Festival Riset Ilmiah Manajemen Dan Akuntansi) 6681(2):122–26. doi:10.55916/frima.v0i2.25.
Herfransis, Veren Putri, and Puspita Rani. 2020. “Pengalaman Memoderasi Penilaian Risiko Kecurangan, Skeptisisme, Dan Independensi Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan.” Equity 23(1):1–18. doi:10.34209/equ.v23i1.1765.
Hulland, J. 1999. “Use of Partial Least Squares (PLS) in Strategic Management Research: A Review of Four Recent Studies.” Strategic Management Journal 110 2(10):195–204.
Hurtt, R. K. 2013. “Development of a Scale to Measure Professional Skepticism.” A Journal of Practice & Theory 1(29):149–71.
Id, Mdn. biz. 2013. “Mdn. Biz. Id.”
Ikhsan, A., &. dkk. 2014. Metodologi Penelitian Bisnis Untuk Akuntansi Dan Manajemen. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Islahuzzaman. 2012. Dasar-Dasar Auditing. Salemba Empat.
Juliandi, A; Irfan, I; & Manurung, S. 2018. Mengolah Data Penelitian Bisnis Dengan SPSS. Lembaga Penelitian Dan Penulisan Ilmiah AQLI.
Kinney, W. R., & Martin, R. D. 1994. “‘Auditor Independence and Financial Statement Comparability.’” Journal of Accounting and Economics 2–317:293–314. Kiswanto, Kiswanto-, and Panji Aziz Maulana. 2019. “Moderasi Pengalaman Pada Pengaruh Fraud Risk Assessment, Skeptisme, Dan Workload Terhadap Kemampuan Mendeteksi Kecurangan.” Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi Dan Bisnis 14(2):183. doi:10.24843/jiab.2019.v14.i02.p04.
Knechel, W. R., & Salterio, S. E. 2016. Auditing: Assurance and Risk. 4th Edition. Routledge. Kompas.com. 2016. “No Title.”
Kumar, R., Mishra, A., & Rathi, S. 2022. “"Auditor Experience and Audit Risk Assessment: A Meta-Analysis.” " Accounting and Business Research 1(52):1–22.
Kurniawan, Gevi; Ngumar, Sutjipto; Kurnia. 2019. “Pengaruh Tekanan Waktu, Fee Audit, Independensi Dan Kompetensi Terhadap Kualitas Audit (Studi Empiris Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Jawa Timur).” Jurnal Ilmu Dan Riset Akuntasi 8:1–4.
Lenz, R., & Hahn, U. 2015. “A Synthesis of Empirical Internal Audit Effectiveness Literature Spanning Two Decades (1995–2014).” International Journal of Auditing 3(19):162–97. Lestari, Dwi, Pupung Purnamasari, and Magnaz Lestira Oktaroza. 2020. “Pengaruh Pola Pikir Dan Pengalaman Auditor Internal Terhadap Fraud Risk Assessment.” Prosiding Akuntansi 6(1):150–54.
Life, Wanaartha. n.d. “No Title.” Wanaartha Life.
Lubis, G. d. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan . Yogyakarta: K-Media.
Marton, Jan; Nilsson, Fredrik;, and Peter Öhman. 2024. Auditing Transformation: Regulation, Digitalisation and Sustainability.
Maryani, Neni, Rendi Kusuma Natita, and Ali Rahman Reza Zaputra. 2023. “The 111 Influence of Information Technology Based Audit Procedures and Audit Experience on Audit Quality.” International Journal of Quantitative Research and Modeling 4(4):276–85. doi:10.46336/ijqrm.v4i4.546.
Muhammad Fajar Alamsyah Razak, Haliah, Andi Kusumawati. 2022. “Pengaruh Fraud Risk Assesment Dan Independensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Aparat Inspektorat Keuangan Daerah.” Jurnal Penelitian Akuntansi Sektor Publik Volume 1 Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 1(2):11.
Muslim, Muslim, Syamsuri Rahim, Muhammad Faisal AR Pelu, and Alma Pratiwi. 2020. “Kualitas Audit: Ditinjau Dari Fee Audit, Risiko Audit Dan Skeptisme Profesional Auditor Sebagai Variabel Moderating.” Ekuitas: Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi 8(1):9. doi:10.23887/ekuitas.v8i1.22474.
Nelson, M. W. 2009. “A Model and Literature Review of Professional Skepticism in Auditing.” Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory 2:1–34.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. 1994. Psychometric Theory (3rd Ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Olivia, Hastuti, Tri Dessy Fadillah, Astrid Aulia Farizki, Annisa Namira, and Heprina Hera Rezeki. 2022. “Pengaruh Profitabilitas Dan Ukuran Perusahaan Terhadap Audit Delay Di BEI Tahun 2019-2021.” ARBITRASE: Journal of Economics and Accounting 3(2):323– 27. doi:10.47065/arbitrase.v3i2.511.
Penny, R., Lee, S., & McLeod, D. 2023. “‘Training and Development in Audit: Enhancing Professional Competence.’” Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 24(1), 34-56. 1(24):34–56.
Pppk.kemenkeu.go.id. 2018. “Pppk.Kemenkeu.Go.Id.”
Primasari, N, H; Azzahra. 2015. “Pengaruh Gender, Supervisi, Independensi, Kompetensi Profesional Dan Pemahaman Aas Standar AUdit Terhadap Audit Judgment.” Jurnal AKuntansi Dan Keuangn 2(4):141–60.
Putri, Atika Wulandari. 2021. “Pengaruh Fraud Risk Assessment Dan Independensi Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan Dengan Skeptisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Intervening.” Jurnal Audit Dan Akuntansi Fakultas Ekonomi 10(2):72–93. Https://Jurnal.Untan.Ac.Id/Index.Php/Jaakfe.
Rachmawati, P., Handayani, S. R., & Putri, M. D. 2019. “Penerapan Standar Audit Dan Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Dalam Meningkatkan Kualitas Audit.” Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi 2:45–60.
Radipta, A., & Supriyadi, T. 2020. “Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Auditor Terhadap Kemampuan Mendeteksi Kecurangan.” Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan 1:15–27. Rahman, I. A., Memon, A. H., Azis, A. A. A., & Abdullah, N. H. 2013. “Modeling Causes of Cost Overrun in Large Construction Projects with Partial Least Square 112 SEM Approach: Contractor’s Perspective. Research.” Journal of Applied Sciences, Engineering and Technology 5:1963–72.
Rinaldy, R., & Amin, M. 2023. “Peran Skeptisisme Profesional Dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan.” Jurnal Riset Akuntansi 3:78–92.
Riyadi, Bernardus, Nella Yantiana, and Rusliyanawati. 2024. “The Effect Of Professionalism, Audit Experience On Audit Quality With Time Budget Pressure As A Moderator At The Inspectorate Of West Kalimantan Province.” 94(4):94 112. http://jurnal.kolibi.org/index.php/neraca.
Rumapea, Chyntia Riana Simamora. 2018. “Pengaruh Kompetensi, Independensi, Due Professional Care, Akuntabilitas, Dan Fraud Risk Assessment Aparat Inspektorat Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dalam Mewujudkan Good Governance Di Pemerintahan Kabupaten Deli Serdang.” Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Methodist 1:74–93.
Santoso, Rizky Darmawan, Ikhsan Budi Riharjo, and Kurnia Kurnia. 2020. “Independensi, Integritas, Serta Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dengan Skeptisisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Pemoderasi.” Journal of Accounting Science 4(2):36–56. doi:10.21070/jas.v4i2.559.
Setyana, Hana Dili, Soedjono Rono, and Fitri Nuraini. 2021. “Pengalaman Kerja Auditor, Etika Auditor, Dan Kompetensi Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik.” Sustainable 1(1):185. doi:10.30651/stb.v1i1.9765.
Shlof, Mohamed A. 2024. “The Effect Of Auditor Characteristics On Alleged Fraud Occurrence And Its Impact On Financial Statement Fraud Risk Assessment And Audit Program Modifications.” Jurnal Kewirausahaan Dan Inovasi 3(2):55–70.
Sinulingga, S. 2013. Metode Penelitian. Medan: Universitas Sumatera Utara Press.
Siregar, Ratih Anggraini, Widia Astuty, and Maya Sari. 2019. “Pengaruh Moral Reasoning, Skeptisisme Profesional Dan Kecerdasan Spiritual Terhadap Kualitas Audit Pada BPKP Provinsi Sumatera Utara.” JAKK : Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Kontemporer 2(2):E- ISSN: 2623-2596.
Solichin, Dinan Azmi. 2020. “Pengaruh Fraud Risk Assessment Dan Kecakapan Auditor Terhadap Kualitas Audit Dalam Pengawasan Keuangan Daerah” (Studi Pada Kantor Inspektorat Provinsi Sulawesi Tenggara).” Jurnal Akuntansi 19(8):59–69.
Solimun. 2002. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) Lisrel Dan Amos: Konsep Dan Aplikasi. Malang: Universitas Brawijaya Press.
Sugiyono. 2019. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&DMetode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif Dan R&D. 3rd Ed. BANDUNG: ALFABETA.
Sukma, Evie, and Raras Virgia Paramitha. 2020. “Pengaruh Pengalaman Auditor, Independensi, Dan Keahlian Profesional Terhadap Kemampuan Auditor Mendeteksi Kecurangan Laporan Keuangan Dengan Skeptisme Profesional 113 Sebagai Variabel Moderasi.” Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pakar 1–6. doi:10.25105/pakar.v0i0.6875.
Suryani, T., & Wiratmaja, I. W. 2021. “Pengaruh Skeptisisme Profesional Terhadap Risiko Kegagalan Audit Pada Kantor Akuntan Publik Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Akuntansi Kontemporer 1:33–47.
Tiwi, Nabella. 2024. “Manajemen Risiko: Deteksi Kecurangan Melalui Strategi Anti Fraud.” Syntax Idea 6(4):1852–62. doi:10.46799/syntax-idea.v6i4.3194.
Wahyudi, Setyo Tri. 2017. Statistika Ekonomi , Konsep, Teori, Dan Penerapan. 1st ed. Malang: UB Press.
Wells, J. T. 2014. Corporate Fraud Handbook: Prevention and Detection (4th Ed.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
Whittington, O. R., & Pany, K. 2022. Principles of Auditing & Other Assurance Services (22nd Ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.
Yuara, Safriani, Ridwan Ibrahim, and Yossi Diantimala. 2019. “Pengaruh Sikap Skeptisme Profesional Auditor, Kompetensi Bukti Audit Dan Tekanan Waktu Terhadap Pendeteksian Kecurangan Pada Inspektorat Kabupaten Bener Meriah.” Jurnal Perspektif doi:10.24815/jped.v4i1.10924. Ekonomi Darussalam 4(1):69–81.
Yunianti, Nieke, Yenni Carolina, and Vincent Tanu Winata. 2021. “Independensi, Pengalaman Kerja Auditor, Dan Kualitas Audit Dengan Skeptisisme Profesional Sebagai Variabel Moderasi.” doi:10.28932/jam.v13i2.4014.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/ecobi.v13i1.8115
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
