MATHEMATICAL PROBLEM-SOLVING ABILITY OF STUDENTS IN TERMS OF ADVERSITY QUOTIENT AND SELF-EFFICACY
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to analyze students' mathematical problem-solvingproblem-solving skills in SPLDV material in terms of adversity quotient and self-efficacy and provide recommendations for improving students' mathematical problem-solvingproblem-solving skills in schools with comparable backgrounds.
Methodology – The research approach used is a qualitative approach with a case study method. The subjects of this study were three ninth-grade students selected based on the students' AQ and SE levels. The data collection technique used was triangulation. The test instrument for this study was a problem-solving ability test. The non-test instruments for this study were the AQ Questionnaire, SE Questionnaire, and interview guidelines. The techniques for examining data validity in qualitative research include testing credibility, transferability, dependability, and confirmability.
Findings – The study found that students with a climber adversity quotient and high self-efficacy excel in mathematical problem-solving, fulfilling all four problem-solving indicators: understanding the problem, planning a strategy, implementing a solution, and re-examining the results. Students with a camper adversity quotient and high self-efficacy have good problem-solving skills but are not optimal, fulfilling three indicators. Students with a quitter adversity quotient and low self-efficacy tend to struggle, fulfilling only two indicators and often giving up.
Contribution – The results of this study are expected to contribute to mathematics education by serving as a reference for research on students' mathematical problem-solving abilities about adversity quotient and self-efficacy.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adetia, R., & Adirakasiwi, A. G. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau Dari Self-Efficacy Siswa. Jurnal Educatio FKIP UNMA, 8(2).
Ahmad, S., & Dewi, N. (2024). Pengaruh Efikasi Diri dan Adversity Quotient terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar Indonesia, 3(3), 133–143. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.51574/judikdas.v3i3.1239
Aisyah, A. S., Riyadi, & Subanti, S. (2021). Description Of The Difficulty Of Students’ Mathematics Problem Solving Assessed From Adversity Quotient (Aq). Aksioma: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 10(2), 1161–1170.
Asok, A. N., & Hasanah, A. (2021). Senior High School Students’ Mathematical Problem Solving Of Three-Variable Linear Equation System. JTAM (Jurnal Teori Dan Aplikasi Matematika), 5(1), 254. https://doi.org/10.31764/jtam.v5i1.3929
Baharullah, wahyuddin, Usman, M. R., & Syam, N. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika Siswa Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika, 11(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.24127/ajpm.v11i2.4766
Cano, J. C., & Lomibao, L. S. (2023). A Mixed Methods Study of the Influence of Phenomenon-based Learning Videos on Students’ Mathematics Self-efficacy, Problem-solving and Reasoning Skills, and Mathematics Achievement. American Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 97–115. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.12691/education-11-3-2
Chabibah, L. N., Siswanah, E., & Tsani, D. F. (2019). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa dalam menyelesaikan soal cerita barisan ditinjau dari adversity quotient. PYTHAGORAS: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 14(2).
Cresswell, J. W. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methode Approaches . Sage Publications.
Fatmasari, H. R., Waluya, S. B., & Sugianto. (2021). Mathematical problem-solving ability based on self-efficacy in junior high school. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(4). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/4/042120
Febrianti, T., Zakiah, N. E., & Ruswana, A. M. (2022). Profil Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Smp Pada Materi Lingkaran Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient (AQ). JKIP: Jurnal Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 3(2).
Hoffman, B., & Schraw, G. (2009). The Influence of Self-Efficacy and Working Memory Capacity On Problem-Solving Efficiency. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 91–100.
Meika, I., Ramadina, I., Sujana, A., & Mauladaniyati, R. (2021). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa Dengan Menggunakan Model Pembelajaran SSCS. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 05(01), 383–390.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2014). Qualitative Data Analysis, A Methods. Sage Publications.
Morin, S., & Herman, T. (2022). Systematic Literature Review: Keberagaman Cara Berpikir Siswa dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari SelfEfficacy. JPMI (Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif), 5(1).
Naimnule, M., Kehi, Y. J., & Bone, D. (2022). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Berdasarkan Langkah-Lang Kah Polya Ditinjau Dari Adversity Quotient Tipe Quitter, Camper Dan Climber Pada Siswa Kelas VIII SMP. Jurnal Eduscience (JES), 9(2). https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v9i2.2957
NCTM. (2018). Curriculum and Evaluation Standards for School Mathematics.
Nurfitriyanti, M., Rosa, N. M., & Nursa’adah, F. P. (2020). Pengaruh Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, Adversity Quotient dan Locus of Control Terhadap Prestasi Belajar Matematika. JKPM: Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika, 5(2). https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.30998/jkpm.v5i2.5929
OECD. (2022). PISA 2022 Mathematics Framework.
Pertiwi, N. L. C., Wiarta, I. W., & Ardana, I. K. (2019). Hubungan Antara Adversity Quotient (Aq) Dengan Hasil Belajar Matematika. Journal of Education Technology, 3(2), 73–80.
Putra, F. K., Hobri, & Setiawani, S. (2020). Profil Self Efficacy Siswa Climber Terhadap Permasalahan Matematika Level Tinggi Berdasarkan Tahapan Polya . Alifmatika: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Matematika , 2(1).
Putri, A. (2018). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Rutin Dan Non-Rutin Pada Materi Aturan Pencacahan. Jurnal Pendidikan Tambusai, 2(2).
Rahmawati, A., Lukman, H. S., & Setiani, A. (2021). Analisis Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Ditinjau dari Tingkat Self-Efficacy. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, 4(2), 79–90. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.46918/equals.v4i2.979
Sa’diyah, R. N., Dwijanto, & Wijayanti, K. (2024). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis ditinjau dari Self-Efficacy pada Project-based Learning berbasis APOS berbantuan E-modul . Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 1243–1258. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31004/cendekia.v8i2.3186
Slameto. (2010). Belajar dan faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhinya. PT. Rineka Cipta.
Sriwahyuni, K., & Maryati, I. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis Siswa pada Materi Statistika. Plusminus: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2, 335.
Verenia, P. U., Zubaidah, T., & Suhartati. (2022). Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematis ditinjau dari Adversity Quotient (AQ) Siswa Kelas VII di SMPN 1 Langsa. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2).
Walle, V. D., Karp, K. S., & Williams, J. M. W. (2013). Elementary and middle school mathematics: Teaching developmentally (8th ed.). Pearson.
Yustiana, Y., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Fitriana, L. (2021). Mathematical problem solving ability of vocational high school students based on adversity quotient. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1806(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1806/1/012092
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i3.7164
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Suci Charolina, Suhendra Suhendra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

