INNER CONFLICT: MATHEMATICAL TRUTH AND STUDENTS’ PERCEPTIONS OF TRUTH

Fauzi Mulyatna, Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa, Syukrul Hamdi

Abstract


Purpose – This study aims to identify the forms of inner conflict potentially experienced by students, as reflected in Teaching Modules and Lesson Plans, and to propose preventive alternatives.

Methodology – This study employed a qualitative research approach with a phenomenological orientation through documentation studies of Teaching Modules and Lesson Plans developed by pre-service and in-service Professional Teacher Education students from 13 cities across Indonesia. The participants in this study consisted of documents produced by 63 students enrolled in the Professional Teacher Education (PPG) program. Data analysis employed triangulation techniques, including time triangulation through document analysis covering the period from 2023 to 2025, and source triangulation using Teaching Modules and Lesson Plans produced by both in-service Professional Teacher Education (PPG) participants and pre-service teacher candidates, previously known as PPG Daljab and PPG Prajabatan.

Findings – Beyond misconceptions, a broader range of issues can generate inner conflict among students. The findings demonstrate that mathematical conceptual contexts continue to produce conflicting interpretations of truth. Inner conflicts within students may arise from several factors: the misperception of truth caused by inaccurate lexical choices in interpreting mathematical concepts, discrepancies between mathematical results and real-world occurrences, the inappropriate selection of instructional media to explain concepts, inaccuracies in mathematical modeling, and logical fallacies in establishing connections between concrete examples and mathematical contexts.

Contribution – This study emphasizes the importance of presenting mathematical truth clearly, unambiguously, and in ways that align with students’ everyday experiences. Furthermore, teachers should avoid generalizing a single mathematical truth across all contexts.

Keywords


Inner Conflict; Mathematical Correctness; Perception;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ansari, S., Sajadi, S. M., & Assareh, A. (2026). Examining the Relationship Between Mathematics Teaching Content and Teaching Methods: A Phenomenological Study (Lower Secondary Mathematics Teachers in District 3 of Tehran). Assessment and Practice in Educational Sciences, 1–12.

Ary, D., Jacobs, L. C., & Razavieh, A. (2019). Introduction to research in education, Tenth Edition. Cengage Learning.

Bruning, R. H., Schraw, G. J., & Ronning, R. R. (1999). Cognitive psychology and instruction. ERIC.

Carter, J. (2024). Mathematical understanding–Common themes in philosophy and mathematics education. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 76, 101202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmathb.2024.101202

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2017). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. California: SAGE Publications.

Daheim, N., Macina, J., Kapur, M., Gurevych, I., & Sachan, M. (2024). Stepwise verification and remediation of student reasoning errors with large language model tutors. Proceedings of the 2024 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 8386–8411.

do Carmo, F. M. A., de O Faustino, J. A., de Lima, M. V. M., Felício, M., Neto, H. B., & Cerqueira, G. S. (2020). The Didactic Contract from the Perspective of the Theory of Didactical Situations: An Integrative Review. Int J Innov Educ Res., 8(7), 123–134.

Edmondson, A. (2023). Right kind of wrong: Why learning to fail can teach us to thrive. Random House.

Geary, D. C. (2008). An evolutionarily informed education science. Educational Psychologist, 43(4), 179–195. https://doi.org/10.1080/00461520802392207

Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Zosh, Jennifer M, Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick, Gray, James H, Robb, Michael B, & Kaufman, Jordy. (2015). Putting Education in “Educational” Apps: Lessons From the Science of Learning. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16(1), 3–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100615569721

Jarrah, A. M., Wardat, Y., & Gningue, S. (2022). Misconception on addition and subtraction of fractions in seventh-grade middle school students. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 18(6), em2115.

Kurudirek, A., Karim, B., Sarhang, D., & Tulqin, S. (2025). Math misconceptions: Mistakes, misunderstanding, and confusion. Educenter: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan, 4(1), 16–25.

Lampert, M. (1990). When the problem is not the question and the solution is not the answer: Mathematical knowing and teaching. American Educational Research Journal, 27(1), 29–63.

Mertens, D. M. (2019). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Sage publications.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis. Sage Publications Inc.

Mulyatna, F., Nurrahmah, A., & Seruni. (2020). Look Same but Different: Misconceptions in Linear. Proceedings of the SEMANTIK Conference of Mathematics Education (SEMANTIK 2019), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200827.107

Park, D., & Ramirez, G. (2022). Frustration in the classroom: Causes and strategies to help teachers cope productively. Educational Psychology Review, 34(4), 1955–1983.

Straesser, R. (2007). Didactics of mathematics: more than mathematics and school! ZDM Mathematics Education, 39(1), 165–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-006-0016-x

Strømskag, H., & Chevallard, Y. (2023). Breaches of the didactic contract as a driving force behind learning and non-learning: a story of flaws and wants. Teaching Mathematics and Its Applications: An International Journal of the IMA, 42(1), 52–64.

Weisberg, Deena Skolnick, Hirsh-Pasek, Kathy, Golinkoff, Roberta Michnick, Kittredge, Audrey K, & Klahr, David. (2016). Guided Play: Principles and Practices. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(3), 177–182. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721416645512

Yan, V. X., Sana, F., & Carvalho, P. F. (2024). No simple solutions to Complex problems: Cognitive science principles can guide but not prescribe educational decisions. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11(1), 59–66.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v13i4.9285

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Fauzi Mulyatna, Dhoriva Urwatul Wutsqa, Syukrul Hamdi

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Lisensi Creative Commons
Jurnal Eduscience (JES) by LPPM Universitas Labuhanbatu is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC BY - NC - SA 4.0)