STUDENT ACTIVITIES AND PERCEPTIONS OF WEB-BASED VIRTUAL LABORATORY: INSIGHT FROM PHYSICS LEARNING
Abstract
Purpose-The implementation of web-based virtual laboratories in physics education has significant potential to enhance students' scientific process skills and conceptual understanding of physics. The objectives of this study are: (1) to analyze the impact of implementing an interactive web-based virtual laboratory in activitiy physics learning, and (2) to describe students' perceptions of the use of this virtual laboratory.
Methodology-The research design follows a pre-experimental method with a one-shot case study approach. The population consisted of all twelfth-grade students, distributed across four classes with consisting of 24 students for the samples. Observations of students’ scientific process skills were conducted to assess the intervention's impact. A questionnaire was administered after the learning session to measure students’ SPS activities before and after the intervention.
Findings—The results of the observational data analysis on scientific process skills revealed an average activity percentage of 90.3%, indicating that the interactive web-based virtual laboratory is highly effective in supporting virtual practical-based learning. Additionally, the analysis of students' perceptions showed an average perception score of 86.42%, categorized as "very good."
Significance– These findings suggest that virtual laboratories can serve as an innovative solution in physics education. However, improvements in operational aspects are still necessary to overcome existing challenges.
Keywords: Virtual laboratory Student activities Perception Physics learning Website
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abdjul, T., Ntobuo, N. E., & Payu, C. (2019). Development of Virtual Laboratory-Based of Learning to Improve
Physics Learning Outcomes of High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 15(2), 97–106.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v15i2.12367
Bybee, R. W., & Ed. (2002). Learning Science and the Science of Learning. Science Educators’ Essay Collection.
National Science Teachers Association.
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., & Sahidu, H. (2015). Pengembangan Model Laboratorium Virtual Berorientasi Pada
Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Bagi Calon Guru Fisika.
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:192479697
Ismail, R., Retnawati, H., & Setiawati, F. A. (2021). Optimal Scale Points for Reliable Measurements : Exploring
the Impact of Scale Point Variation. Jurnal Pengukuran Psikologi Dan Pendidikan Indonesia, 13(1), 45–56.
https://doi.org/10.15408/jp3i.v13i1.34173
Istiqlal, M., Istiyono, E., Widihastuti, Sari, D. K., Danni, R., & Safitri, I. (2024). Construction of Mathematics
Cognitive Test Instrument of Computational Thinking Model for Madrasah Aliyah Students. Nazhruna:
Jurnal Pendidikan Islam, 7(2), 475–492. https://doi.org/10.31538/nzh.v7i2.4425
Jong, T., Linn, M., & Zacharia, Z. (2013). Physical and Virtual Laboratories in Science and Engineering
Education. Science (New York, N.Y.), 340, 305–308. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1230579
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (Kemdikbud). (2022). Kurikulum Merdeka: Implementasi dan evaluasi.
Kemendikbud.
Kusumayuni, P. N., Suarni, N. K., & Margunayasa, I. G. (2023). Model Discovery Learning Berbasis STEAM:
Dampaknya Terhadap Hasil Belajar IPA dan Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa. Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan
Profesi Guru, 6(1), 186–195. https://doi.org/10.23887/jippg.v6i1.59771
Manikowati, Nf., & Iskandar, D. (2018). Pengembangan Model Mobile Virtual Laboratorium Untuk
Pembelajaran Praktikum Siswa SMA. Jurnal Kwangsan, 6(1), 23.
https://doi.org/10.31800/jtp.kw.v6n1.p23--42
Piaget, J. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. New York: Orion Press
Potkonjak, V., Gardner, M., Callaghan, V., Mattila, P., Guetl, C., Petrović, V., & Jovanovic, K. (2016). Virtual
Laboratories for Education in Science, Technology, and Engineering: a Review. Computers & Education,
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2016.02.002
Rina Mirdayanti, & Murni. (2017). Kajian Penggunaan Laboratorium Virtual Berbasis Simulasi Sebagai Upaya
Mengatasi Ketidak-Sediaan Laboratorium. Visipena Journal, 8(2), 323–330.
https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v8i2.415
Safitri, I., & Ansyari, R. (2024). The Calibration of Science Achievement Test Based on Integrated Islamic
Curriculum. 8th International Conference on Education and Multimedia Technology (ICEMT), 329–336.
https://doi.org/10.1145/3678726.3678727
Safitri, I., Chastanti, I., Hasibuan, lily R., Rohana, Sujarwo, Irmayanti, & Nasution, H. F. (2022). Teachers’
readiness in the implementation of online learning during COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of
Evaluation and Research in Education, 1082–1089.
https://doi.org/http://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i3.22463
Safitri, I., Muti’ah, R., & Sriono. (2022). Nilai-nilai Karakter pada Siswa SMP (Studi di Kabupaten Labuhanbatu). PT.
Mega Press Nusantara.
Safitri, I., Rosnawati, R., & Ansyari, R. (2024). Estimasi Kesalahan Pengukuran dalam Penilaian Sidang Skripsi:
Generalizability Theory Analysis. Afeksi: Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 5(1), 162–168.
https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.35672/afeksi.v5i1.220
Setiawan, T., Dewi, U. M., Sari, A. M., & Absa, M. (n.d.). Application The Quantum Learning Method Using
Simulation Media with The TANDUR Strategy to Improve Student Learning Outcomes. 1(1).
https://doi.org/10.33830/cocatalyst.vol1iss1.5132
| J u r n a l E d u s c i e n c e , V o l . 1 2 , N o . 1 ( 2 0 2 5 )
Sugiyono. (2016). Methods of quantitative, qualitative and R & D research. Alfabeta.Abdjul, T., Ntobuo, N. E., &
Payu, C. (2019). Development of Virtual Laboratory-Based of Learning to Improve Physics Learning
Outcomes of High School Students. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 15(2), 97–106.
https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v15i2.12367
Cassady, J. C., & Johnson, R. E. (2002). Cognitive Test Anxiety and Academic Performance. Contemporary
Educational Psychology, 27(2), 270–295. https://doi.org/10.1006/ceps.2001.1094
Piaget. (1970). Science of Education and the Psychology of the Child. Orion Pres.
Rina Mirdayanti, & Murni. (2017). Kajian Penggunaan Laboratorium Virtual Berbasis Simulasi Sebagai Upaya
Mengatasi Ketidak-Sediaan Laboratorium. Visipena Journal, 8(2), 323–330.
https://doi.org/10.46244/visipena.v8i2.415
Sugiyono. (2016). Methods of quantitative, qualitative and R & D research. Alfabeta.
Swandi, A., & Amin, B. D. (2016). The Development of Student’s Worksheet of Physics Based on Virtual Simulation
and Its Influence on Physics Learning Outcomes of Students.
Zulimah, Z., Abdurrahman, A., & Jalmo, T. (2018). The Effectiveness of Students’ Worksheet of Virtual
Laboratory Practice on Dynamic Electricity to Improve Science Process Skill. International Journal of
Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 4(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.4.4.14
Swandi, A., & Amin, B. D. (2016). The Development of Student’s Worksheet of Physics Based on Virtual Simulation
and Its Influence on Physics Learning Outcomes of Students.
https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:63137689
Yulianti, D., Khanafiyah, S., & Sugiyanto. (2012). Penerapan Virtual Experiment Berbasis Inkuiri untuk
Mengembangkan Kemandirian Mahasiswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 8, 127–134.
Yusuf, I., & Widyaningsih, S. W. (2018). Implementasi Pembelajaran Fisika Berbasis Laboratorium Virtual
terhadap Keterampilan Proses Sains dan Persepsi Mahasiswa. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 6(1), 18.
https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v6i1.4378
Zacharia, Z., & Olympiou, G. (2011). Physical versus virtual manipulative experimentation in physics learning.
Learning and Instruction, 21, 317–331. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.03.001
Zulimah, Z., Abdurrahman, A., & Jalmo, T. (2018). The Effectiveness of Students’ Worksheet of Virtual
Laboratory Practice on Dynamic Electricity to Improve Science Process Skill. International Journal of
Advanced Engineering, Management and Science, 4(4), 319–328. https://doi.org/10.22161/ijaems.4.4.14
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i1.6449
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 TULUS SETIAWAN, Rizki Suwanda, Said Fadlan Anshari, Ria Ananda, Fanita Fanita

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

