SCIENTIFIC-BASED NUMERACY LITERACY TEACHING MATERIALS IN LEARNING MANAGEMENT: STUDENT MOTIVATION AND HIGHER THINKING SKILLS
Abstract
Purpose – This study aims to analyse the effect of science-based numeracy literacy teaching materials in learning management on students' motivation and higher order thinking skills.
Methodology – This study uses a quantitative approach with a quasi-experimental method that applies a nonequivalent control group design. In this study, the sample was selected using a purposive sampling technique, so that the subjects taken have met certain criteria that are in accordance with the objectives of the study. The instruments used in data collection include questionnaires to measure motivation and tests designed to assess high order thinking skills. The data obtained were analyzed using an independent sample t-test, which aims to see significant differences between the experimental group and the control group in the variables studied.
Findings – The results showed a difference in the average score of the experimental class posttest motivation of 80.77, while the control group posttest was 70.77, while the average score of higher order thinking skills of the experimental class posttest was 80.36, while the control group posttest was 65.06. Sig (2-tailed) independent sample t-test value of motivation and higher order thinking skills is 0.000 <0.05. This shows that there is a significant difference (real) between the average score of motivation and higher order thinking skills of experimental and control group students by using scientific-based numeracy literacy teaching materials in learning management.
Contribution – This research makes a significant contribution to the development of scientific-based numeracy literacy teaching materials, especially in the context of learning management in higher education. With the existence of teaching materials that are systematically designed and scientifically based, this research plays a role in improving the quality of learning, especially in optimising the interaction between lecturers and students.Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Amali, L. N., Anggani Linggar Bharati, D., & Rozi, F. (2022). The Implementation of High Order Thinking Skills (HOTS) Assessment to Evaluate the Students’ Reading Comprehension Achievement. English Education Journal, 12(1), 10–18. https://doi.org/10.15294/eej.v12i1.52571
Amin, A., Asiyah, A., Syafal, Z., Alimni, A., Nurlaili, N., Wulandari, A., & Kurniawan, D. A. (2022). Motivation and implementation of Islamic concept in madrasah ibtidaiyah school: Urban and rural. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 11(1), 345–352. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v11i1.21943
Campbell, D., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and Quasi Experimental Design for Research. Rand Mc Nally College Publishing Company.
Darwin, Rusdin, D., Mukminatien, N., Suryati, N., Laksmi, E. D., & Marzuki. (2024). Critical thinking in the AI era: An exploration of EFL students’ perceptions, benefits, and limitations. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2023.2290342
Dašić, D., Kostadinović, M. I., Vlajković, M., & Pavlović, M. (2024). Digital Literacy in the Service of Science and Scientific Knowledge. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 12(1), 219–227. https://doi.org/10.23947/2334-8496-2024-12-1-219-227
Eek, F., & Stigmar, K. (2024). Scientific approach, attitudes, and perspectives on research among Swedish physiotherapy students—a cross-sectional study. BMC Medical Education, 24(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-05477-0
Fatmawati, A., Zubaidah, S., Mahanal, S., & Sutopo. (2022). Representation Skills of Students with Different Ability Levels when Learning Using the LCMR Model. Pegem Journal of Education and Instruction, 13(1), 177–192. https://doi.org/10.47750/pegegog.13.01.20
Firoozi, M. R., Kazemi, A., & Jokar, M. (2017). The role of socio-cognitive variables in predicting learning satisfaction in smart schools. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(3), 613–626.
Fischer, B., & Brückner, J.P. (2024). Motivation und Intention zum Sporttreiben in der Freizeit. Ist das Trainer*innenverhalten bedeutsamer oder die Motivation im Schulsport? Forum Kinder- Und Jugendsport, 5(1), 11–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43594-024-00113-7
Glüer-Pagin, K., & Spectre, L. (2024). Where is the Motivation in Motivated Numeracy? Review of Philosophy and Psychology, May. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-024-00737-w
Handayani, N., Aw, S., Zamroni, Imanita, M., Setiawan, J., & Fadli, M. R. (2024). Development of higher order thinking skill assessment instruments in social studies learning. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(2), 923–933. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.26448
Hernawati, D., Amin, M., Irawati, M. H., Indriwati, S. E., & Omar, N. (2018). The effectiveness of scientific approach using encyclopedia as learning materials in improving students’ science process skills in science. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 7(3), 266–272. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v7i3.14459
Iancu, M. (2014). Socio-cognitive Conflict in Learning Biology-challenge, Solving and Roles. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 127, 68–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.03.214
Jumadi, J., Perdana, R., Riwayani, & Rosana, D. (2021). The impact of problem-based learning with argument mapping and online laboratory on scientific argumentation skill. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(1), 16–23. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i1.20593
Kanphukiew, S., & Nuangchalerm, P. (2024). Enhancing Scientific Problem-Solving and Learning Achievement of Lower Secondary Students Through Active Learning. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(1), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v13i1.47672
Kholifah, N., Kurdi, M. S., Nurtanto, M., Mutohhari, F., Fawaid, M., & Subramaniam, T. S. (2023). The role of teacher self-efficacy on the instructional quality in 21st century: A study on vocational teachers, Indonesia. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(2), 998–1006. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i2.23949
Kholili, M. I., Dewantoro, A., Surur, N., & Hapsari, N. T. (2024). The 21st-century skills scales: many facet Rasch measurements. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(3), 1424–1433. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.26651
Kurniawan, E. ., Mundilarto, & Istiyono, E. (2024). Improving student higher order thinking skills using Synectic-HOTS-oriented learning model. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 13(2), 1132–1140. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25002
Kurniawan, H., Budiyono, Sajidan, & Siswandari. (2021). The PINTER learning model to enhance higher order thinking and communication skill in Algebra. International Journal of Instruction, 14(3), 359–374. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2021.14321a
Loyens, S. M. M., van Meerten, J. E., Schaap, L., & Wijnia, L. (2023). Situating Higher-Order, Critical, and Critical-Analytic Thinking in Problem- and Project-Based Learning Environments: A Systematic Review. In Educational Psychology Review (Vol. 35, Issue 2). Springer US. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-023-09757-x
Lu, K., Yang, H. H., Shi, Y., & Wang, X. (2021). Examining the key influencing factors on college students’ higher-order thinking skills in the smart classroom environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-020-00238-7
Maharani, R., & Dasari, D. (2024). Numeracy Literacy Ability Viewed by Characteristics of Students’ Way of Thinking. KnE Social Sciences, 2024, 633–641. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v9i13.15967
Manurung, N., Tarigan, M. R. M., & Saputra, R. (2023). The Influence of Rare Plants Exploration in Taman Eden 100 Lumban Julu on Students’ Science Process Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 12(3), 355–365. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v12i3.42696
Mohamed, R., & Lebar, O. (2017). Authentic Assessment in Assessing Higher Order Thinking Skills. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 7(2), 466. https://doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v7-i2/2021
Mundelsee, L., & Jurkowski, S. (2021). Think and pair before share: Effects of collaboration on students’ in-class participation. Learning and Individual Differences, 88(May 2020), 102015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2021.102015
Näykki, P., Isohätälä, J., & Järvelä, S. (2021). “You really brought all your feelings out” – Scaffolding students to identify the socio-emotional and socio-cognitive challenges in collaborative learning. Learning, Culture and Social Interaction, 30(June). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcsi.2021.100536
Novita, L., Sukmanasa, E., Suhardi, E., & Suhendra. (2023). Optimizing and strengthening the productivity of lecturer’s scientific work. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(3), 1336–1345. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i3.25101
Nowlan, N., Arya, A., Qorbani, H. S., & Abdinejad, M. (2023). Higher-order thinking skills assessment in 3D virtual learning environments using motifs and expert data. Computers & Education: X Reality, 2(February), 100012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cexr.2023.100012
Ong, S. G. T., & Quek, G. C. L. (2023). Enhancing teacher–student interactions and student online engagement in an online learning environment. Learning Environments Research, 26(3), 681–707. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10984-022-09447-5
Prasetyono, H., Abdillah, A., Djuhartono, T., Ramdayana, I. P., & Desnaranti, L. (2021). Improvement of teacher’s professional competency in strengthening learning methods to maximize curriculum implementation. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 10(2), 720–727. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v10i2.21010
Rangkuti, A. N., Sitompul, L., Amran, A., Lubis, M. S., Hoiriyah, D., Sari, L. N. I., Nasution, M., & Rambe, S. (2024). the Influence of Scientific-Based Numeracy Literacy Teaching Materials on Students’ Motivation and Higher-Order Thinking Skills. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 13(4), 583–596. https://doi.org/10.15294/88jfsm61
Rohmah, A. N., Sutama, S., Hidayati, Y. M., Fauziati, E., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2022). Planning for Cultivation Numerical Literacy in Mathematics Learning for Minimum Competency Assessment (AKM) in Elementary Schools. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 9(3), 503–516. https://doi.org/10.53400/mimbar-sd.v9i3.51774
Sa-Ngiemjit, M., Vázquez-Alonso, Á., & Manassero Mas, M. A. (2024). Problem-solving skills of high school students in chemistry. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(3), 1825–1831. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i3.27421
Saputri, A. C., Sajidan, Rinanto, Y., Afandi, & Prasetyanti, N. M. (2019). Improving students’ critical thinking skills in cell-metabolism learning using Stimulating Higher Order Thinking Skills model. International Journal of Instruction, 12(1), 327–342. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2019.12122a
Schaller, M. D., Gencheva, M., Gunther, M. R., & Weed, S. A. (2023). Training doctoral students in critical thinking and experimental design using problem-based learning. BMC Medical Education, 23(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-023-04569-7
Setiyani, Waluya, S. B., Sukestiyarno, Y. L., Cahyono, A. N., & Santi, D. P. D. (2024). Assessing numeracy skills on flat shapes and scaffolding forms in junior high school. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(1), 422–432. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i1.25186
Shofiyah, N., Suprapto, N., Prahani, B. K., Jatmiko, B., Anggraeni, D. M., & Nisa’, K. (2024). Exploring undergraduate students’ scientific reasoning in the force and motion concept. Cogent Education, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2024.2365579
Subali, B., Kumaidi, Aminah, N. S., & Sumintono, B. (2019). Student achievement based on the use of scientific method in the natural science subject in elementary school. Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia, 8(1), 39–51. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpii.v8i1.16010
Suhendi, A., Purwarno, P., & Chairani, S. (2021). Constructivism-Based Teaching and Learning in Indonesian Education. KnE Social Sciences, 2021, 76–89. https://doi.org/10.18502/kss.v5i4.8668
Syamsuddin, A., Nurjannah, S., & Kaddafi, H. (2023). Effectiveness of Hand-Out Based on a Scientific Approach in Improving the Numeracy Literacy Skill of Class V Elementary School Students. International Journal of Research and Review, 10(10), 28–36. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20231005
Termaat, A. (2024). How disciplinary detail obscures the metacognitive potential of curriculums. Curriculum Perspectives, 0123456789. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41297-024-00257-8
Triwahyuningtyas, D., & Sesanti, N. R. (2023). Metacognition analysis of five grade students in elementary school on numbers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 12(1), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v12i1.23233
Valladares, L. (2021). Scientific Literacy and Social Transformation: Critical Perspectives About Science Participation and Emancipation. In Science and Education (Vol. 30, Issue 3). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11191-021-00205-2
Walter, Y. (2024). Embracing the future of Artificial Intelligence in the classroom: the relevance of AI literacy, prompt engineering, and critical thinking in modern education. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00448-3
Wisanti, Indah, N. K., & Putri, E. K. (2024). Scientific digital poster assignments: strengthen concepts, train creativity, and communication skills. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education , 13(2), 1035–1044. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijere.v13i2.25909
Yáñez de Aldecoa, C., & Gómez-Trigueros, I. M. (2022). Challenges with Complex Situations in the Teaching and Learning of Social Sciences in Initial Teacher Education. Social Sciences, 11(7). https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11070295
DOI: https://doi.org/10.36987/jes.v12i3.7122
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Srie Faizah Lisnasari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

